unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] Fix time/tst-cpuclock1 intermitent failures
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:41:40 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <158921890091.13128.8968594041404693853@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421174456.28663-1-lamm@linux.ibm.com>

PING.

Quoting Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha (2020-04-21 14:44:56)
> This test fails intermittently in systems with heavy load as
> CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID is subject to scheduler pressure.  Thus the
> test boundaries were relaxed to keep it from failing on such systems.
> 
> A refactor of the spent time checking was made with some support
> functions.  With the advantage to representing time jitter in percent
> of the target.
> 
> The values used by the test boundaries are all empirical.
> 
> ---
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> I also got skeptical about my dataset so I genegerated another one.
> That .4 boundry was indeed too low.  Also, the support/tst-timespec was
> not actually running any tests because of a lazy bug, sorry about that.
> Thanks for taking the time for reviewing this.
> 
> changes on V9:
>         Add new testcases
>         Fix support/tst-timespec do_run
>         Add comments
>         Change boundaries
> 
> changes on V8:
>         Add support_timespec_ns
>         Add more tests
> 
> This list of changes where getting to long.
> ---
>  support/Makefile       |   1 +
>  support/timespec.c     |  64 +++++++++
>  support/timespec.h     |   8 ++
>  support/tst-timespec.c | 320 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  time/tst-cpuclock1.c   |  52 +++----
>  5 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 support/tst-timespec.c
> 
> diff --git a/support/Makefile b/support/Makefile
> index 6e38b87ebe..cacaac96a5 100644
> --- a/support/Makefile
> +++ b/support/Makefile
> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ tests = \
>    tst-test_compare \
>    tst-test_compare_blob \
>    tst-test_compare_string \
> +  tst-timespec \
>    tst-xreadlink \
>    tst-xsigstack \
>  
> diff --git a/support/timespec.c b/support/timespec.c
> index ea6b947546..103beafdc4 100644
> --- a/support/timespec.c
> +++ b/support/timespec.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>  #include <support/timespec.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <stdint.h>
> +#include <assert.h>
> +#include <intprops.h>
>  
>  void
>  test_timespec_before_impl (const char *file, int line,
> @@ -57,3 +59,65 @@ test_timespec_equal_or_after_impl (const char *file, int line,
>             (intmax_t) diff.tv_sec, (intmax_t) diff.tv_nsec);
>    }
>  }
> +
> +/* Convert TIME to nanoseconds stored in shrinked in a long.
> +   Returns long maximum or minimum if the conversion overflows
> +   or underflows, respectively.  */
> +long
> +support_timespec_ns (struct timespec time)
> +{
> +  long time_ns;
> +  if (INT_MULTIPLY_WRAPV(time.tv_sec, TIMESPEC_HZ, &time_ns))
> +   {
> +      return (time.tv_sec < 0) ? TYPE_MINIMUM(long): TYPE_MAXIMUM(long);
> +   }
> +  if (INT_ADD_WRAPV(time_ns, time.tv_nsec, &time_ns))
> +   {
> +      return (time.tv_nsec < 0) ? TYPE_MINIMUM(long): TYPE_MAXIMUM(long);
> +   }
> +  return time_ns;
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns t normalized timespec with .tv_nsec < TIMESPEC_HZ
> +   and the whole seconds  added to .tv_sec. If an overflow or
> +   underflow occurs the values are clamped to its maximum or
> +   minimum respectively.  */
> +struct timespec
> +support_timespec_normalize (struct timespec time)
> +{
> +  struct timespec norm;
> +  if (INT_ADD_WRAPV (time.tv_sec, (time.tv_nsec / TIMESPEC_HZ), &norm.tv_sec))
> +   {
> +     norm.tv_sec = (time.tv_nsec < 0) ? TYPE_MINIMUM (time_t): TYPE_MAXIMUM (time_t);
> +     norm.tv_nsec = (time.tv_nsec < 0) ? -1 * (TIMESPEC_HZ - 1) : TIMESPEC_HZ - 1;
> +     return norm;
> +   }
> +  norm.tv_nsec = time.tv_nsec % TIMESPEC_HZ;
> +  return norm;
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns TRUE if the observed time is within the given percentage
> +   bounds of the expected time, and FALSE otherwise.
> +   For example the call
> +
> +   support_timespec_check_in_range(expected, observed, .5, 1.2);
> +
> +   will check if
> +
> +   .5 <= observed/expected <= 1.2
> +
> +   In other words it will check if observed time is within 50% to
> +   120% of the expected time.  */
> +int
> +support_timespec_check_in_range (struct timespec expected, struct timespec observed,
> +                             double lower_bound, double upper_bound)
> +{
> +  assert (upper_bound >= lower_bound);
> +  long expected_norm, observed_norm;
> +  expected_norm = support_timespec_ns (expected);
> +  /* Don't divide by zero  */
> +  assert(expected_norm != 0);
> +  observed_norm = support_timespec_ns (observed);
> +  double ratio = (double)observed_norm / expected_norm;
> +  return (lower_bound <= ratio && ratio <= upper_bound);
> +}
> diff --git a/support/timespec.h b/support/timespec.h
> index c5852dfe75..fd5466745d 100644
> --- a/support/timespec.h
> +++ b/support/timespec.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,14 @@ void test_timespec_equal_or_after_impl (const char *file, int line,
>                                          const struct timespec left,
>                                          const struct timespec right);
>  
> +long support_timespec_ns (struct timespec time);
> +
> +struct timespec support_timespec_normalize (struct timespec time);
> +
> +int support_timespec_check_in_range (struct timespec expected, struct timespec observed,
> +                                 double lower_bound, double upper_bound);
> +
> +
>  /* Check that the timespec on the left represents a time before the
>     time on the right. */
>  #define TEST_TIMESPEC_BEFORE(left, right)                               \
> diff --git a/support/tst-timespec.c b/support/tst-timespec.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b421b219fd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/support/tst-timespec.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
> +/* Test for support_timespec_check_in_range function.
> +   Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +   This file is part of the GNU C Library.
> +
> +   The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> +   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> +   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> +
> +   The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> +   Lesser General Public License for more details.
> +
> +   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> +   License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
> +   <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
> +
> +#include <support/timespec.h>
> +#include <support/check.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
> +
> +#define TIMESPEC_HZ 1000000000
> +
> +struct timespec_ns_test_case
> +{
> +  struct timespec time;
> +  long time_ns;
> +};
> +
> +struct timespec_norm_test_case
> +{
> +  struct timespec time;
> +  struct timespec norm;
> +};
> +
> +struct timespec_test_case
> +{
> +  struct timespec expected;
> +  struct timespec observed;
> +  double upper_bound;
> +  double lower_bound;
> +  int result;
> +};
> +
> +/* Test cases for timespec_ns */
> +struct timespec_ns_test_case ns_cases[] = {
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .time_ns = 0,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .time_ns = 1,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .time_ns = TIMESPEC_HZ,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .time_ns = TIMESPEC_HZ + 1,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = -1},
> +   .time_ns = -1,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .time_ns = -TIMESPEC_HZ,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = -1},
> +   .time_ns = -TIMESPEC_HZ - 1,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = -1},
> +   .time_ns = TIMESPEC_HZ - 1,
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .time_ns = -TIMESPEC_HZ + 1,
> +  },
> +  // Overflow bondary by 2
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX / TIMESPEC_HZ, .tv_nsec = LONG_MAX%TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MAX - 1,
> +  },
> +  // Overflow bondary
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX / TIMESPEC_HZ, .tv_nsec = LONG_MAX%TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MAX,
> +  },
> +  // Underflow bondary by 1
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN / TIMESPEC_HZ, .tv_nsec = LONG_MIN%TIMESPEC_HZ + 1},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MIN + 1,
> +  },
> +  // Underflow bondary
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN / TIMESPEC_HZ, .tv_nsec = LONG_MIN%TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MIN,
> +  },
> +  // Multiplication overflow
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX / TIMESPEC_HZ + 1, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MAX,
> +  },
> +  // Multiplication underflow
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN / TIMESPEC_HZ - 1, .tv_nsec = -1},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MIN,
> +  },
> +  // Sum overflows
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX / TIMESPEC_HZ, .tv_nsec = LONG_MAX%TIMESPEC_HZ + 1},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MAX,
> +  },
> +  // Sum underflow
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN / TIMESPEC_HZ, .tv_nsec = LONG_MIN%TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .time_ns = LONG_MIN,
> +  }
> +};
> +
> +/* Test cases for timespec_norm */
> +struct timespec_norm_test_case norm_cases[] = {
> +  // Positive cases
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 0}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 1}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ + 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 1}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 2, .tv_nsec = 0}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ + 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = 2, .tv_nsec = 1}
> +  },
> +  // Negative cases
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = -1}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = -2, .tv_nsec = 0}
> +  },
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = -2, .tv_nsec = -1}
> +  },
> +  // Overflow bondary by 2
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX - 2, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ + 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX - 1, 1},
> +  },
> +  // Overflow bondary by 1
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX - 1, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ + 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +  },
> +  // Underflow bondary by 2
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN + 2, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN + 1, -1},
> +  },
> +  // Underflow bondary by 1
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN + 1, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -1},
> +  },
> +  // SUM overflow
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +  },
> +  // SUM underflow
> +  {.time = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .norm = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -1 * (TIMESPEC_HZ - 1)},
> +  }
> +};
> +
> +/* Test cases for timespec_check_in_range  */
> +struct timespec_test_case check_cases[] = {
> +  // 0 - In range
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 1 - Out of range
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 2, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 0,
> +  },
> +  // 2 - Upper Bound
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 2, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .upper_bound = 2, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 3 - Lower Bound
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 0, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 4 - Out of range by nanosecs
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 500},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 0,
> +  },
> +  // 5 - In range by nanosecs
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 50000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1.3, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 6 - Big nanosecs
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 4000000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = .001, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 7 - In range Negative values
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 8 - Out of range Negative values
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .upper_bound = -1, .lower_bound = -1, .result = 0,
> +  },
> +  // 9 - Negative values with negative nanosecs
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = -2000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 0,
> +  },
> +  // 10 - Strict bounds
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = 0},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = -1, .tv_nsec = -20000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1.00002, .lower_bound = 1.0000191, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 11 - Strict bounds with loose upper bound
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 20000},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 30000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1.0000100000, .lower_bound = 1.0000099998, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 12 - Strict bounds with loose lower bound
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 20000},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 30000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1.0000099999, .lower_bound = 1.00000999979, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 13 - Strict bounds highest precision
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 20000},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 30000},
> +   .upper_bound = 1.00000999980001, .lower_bound = 1.00000999979999, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  /* Maximum/Minimum long values  */
> +  // 14
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ - 2},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = .9, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 15 - support_timespec_ns overflow
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 16 - support_timespec_ns overflow + underflow
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 0,
> +  },
> +  // 17 - support_timespec_ns underflow
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 18 - support_timespec_ns underflow + overflow
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = LONG_MIN, .tv_nsec = -TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX, .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 0,
> +  },
> +  // 19 - Biggest division
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX / TIMESPEC_HZ , .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .upper_bound = 1, .lower_bound = 1.0842021724855044e-19, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +  // 20 - Lowest division
> +  {.expected = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 1},
> +   .observed = {.tv_sec = LONG_MAX / TIMESPEC_HZ , .tv_nsec = TIMESPEC_HZ - 1},
> +   .upper_bound = LONG_MAX, .lower_bound = 1, .result = 1,
> +  },
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +do_test (void)
> +{
> +  int i = 0;
> +  int ntests = sizeof (ns_cases) / sizeof (ns_cases[0]);
> +
> +  printf("Testing support_timespec_ns\n");
> +  for (i = 0; i < ntests; i++)
> +    {
> +      TEST_COMPARE (support_timespec_ns (ns_cases[i].time),
> +                   ns_cases[i].time_ns);
> +    }
> +
> +  ntests = sizeof (norm_cases) / sizeof (norm_cases[0]);
> +  struct timespec result;
> +  printf("Testing support_timespec_normalize\n");
> +  for (i = 0; i < ntests; i++)
> +    {
> +      result = support_timespec_normalize (norm_cases[i].time);
> +      TEST_COMPARE (norm_cases[i].norm.tv_sec, result.tv_sec);
> +      TEST_COMPARE (norm_cases[i].norm.tv_nsec, result.tv_nsec);
> +    }
> +
> +  ntests = sizeof (check_cases) / sizeof (check_cases[0]);
> +  printf("Testing support_timespec_check_in_range\n");
> +  for (i = 0; i < ntests; i++)
> +    {
> +      /* Its hard to find which test failed with just the TEST_COMPARE report.
> +         So here we print every running testcase as well.  */
> +      printf("Test case %d\n", i);
> +      TEST_COMPARE (support_timespec_check_in_range
> +                   (check_cases[i].expected, check_cases[i].observed,
> +                    check_cases[i].lower_bound,
> +                    check_cases[i].upper_bound), check_cases[i].result);
> +    }
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#include <support/test-driver.c>
> diff --git a/time/tst-cpuclock1.c b/time/tst-cpuclock1.c
> index 0120906f23..1ac611a92b 100644
> --- a/time/tst-cpuclock1.c
> +++ b/time/tst-cpuclock1.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <signal.h>
>  #include <stdint.h>
>  #include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <support/timespec.h>
>  
>  /* This function is intended to rack up both user and system time.  */
>  static void
> @@ -155,16 +156,12 @@ do_test (void)
>    printf ("live PID %d after sleep => %ju.%.9ju\n",
>           child, (uintmax_t) after.tv_sec, (uintmax_t) after.tv_nsec);
>  
> -  struct timespec diff = { .tv_sec = after.tv_sec - before.tv_sec,
> -                          .tv_nsec = after.tv_nsec - before.tv_nsec };
> -  if (diff.tv_nsec < 0)
> -    {
> -      --diff.tv_sec;
> -      diff.tv_nsec += 1000000000;
> -    }
> -  if (diff.tv_sec != 0
> -      || diff.tv_nsec > 600000000
> -      || diff.tv_nsec < 100000000)
> +  /* The bound values are empirically defined by testing this code over high cpu
> +     usage and different nice values. Of all the values we keep the 90th
> +     percentile of values and use those values for our testing allowed range.  */
> +  struct timespec diff = timespec_sub (support_timespec_normalize (after),
> +                                      support_timespec_normalize (before));
> +  if (!support_timespec_check_in_range (sleeptime, diff, .9,  1.1))
>      {
>        printf ("before - after %ju.%.9ju outside reasonable range\n",
>               (uintmax_t) diff.tv_sec, (uintmax_t) diff.tv_nsec);
> @@ -194,19 +191,16 @@ do_test (void)
>         }
>        else
>         {
> -         struct timespec d = { .tv_sec = afterns.tv_sec - after.tv_sec,
> -                               .tv_nsec = afterns.tv_nsec - after.tv_nsec };
> -         if (d.tv_nsec < 0)
> -           {
> -             --d.tv_sec;
> -             d.tv_nsec += 1000000000;
> -           }
> -         if (d.tv_sec > 0
> -             || d.tv_nsec < sleeptime.tv_nsec
> -             || d.tv_nsec > sleeptime.tv_nsec * 2)
> +        /* The bound values are empirically defined by testing this code over
> +           high cpu usage and different nice values. Of all the values we keep
> +           the 90th percentile of values and use those values for our testing
> +           allowed range.  */
> +         diff = timespec_sub (support_timespec_normalize (afterns),
> +                              support_timespec_normalize (after));
> +         if (!support_timespec_check_in_range (sleeptime, diff, .9, 1.2))
>             {
>               printf ("nanosleep time %ju.%.9ju outside reasonable range\n",
> -                     (uintmax_t) d.tv_sec, (uintmax_t) d.tv_nsec);
> +                     (uintmax_t) diff.tv_sec, (uintmax_t) diff.tv_nsec);
>               result = 1;
>             }
>         }
> @@ -240,15 +234,13 @@ do_test (void)
>    /* Should be close to 0.6.  */
>    printf ("dead PID %d => %ju.%.9ju\n",
>           child, (uintmax_t) dead.tv_sec, (uintmax_t) dead.tv_nsec);
> -
> -  diff.tv_sec = dead.tv_sec - after.tv_sec;
> -  diff.tv_nsec = dead.tv_nsec - after.tv_nsec;
> -  if (diff.tv_nsec < 0)
> -    {
> -      --diff.tv_sec;
> -      diff.tv_nsec += 1000000000;
> -    }
> -  if (diff.tv_sec != 0 || diff.tv_nsec > 200000000)
> +  /* The bound values are empirically defined by testing this code over high cpu
> +     usage and different nice values. Of all the values we keep the 90th
> +     percentile of values and use those values for our testing allowed range.  */
> +  diff = timespec_sub (support_timespec_normalize (dead),
> +                      support_timespec_normalize (after));
> +  sleeptime.tv_nsec = 100000000;
> +  if (!support_timespec_check_in_range (sleeptime, diff, .9, 1.2))
>      {
>        printf ("dead - after %ju.%.9ju outside reasonable range\n",
>               (uintmax_t) diff.tv_sec, (uintmax_t) diff.tv_nsec);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-11 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06 14:48 [PATCH v2] Fix time/tst-cpuclock1 intermitent failures Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-02-17 16:44 ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-02-18 12:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-02-19 16:42   ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-02-19 18:51     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-02-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-04 19:24   ` Matheus Castanho
2020-03-06 17:31     ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-10 16:20   ` [PATCH v4] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-10 16:30     ` Andreas Schwab
2020-03-10 17:45     ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-03-23 17:20     ` [PATCH v5] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-03-23 21:06       ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-03-24 19:42         ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-03-31 18:55           ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-03-31 11:34       ` [PATCH v6] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-03-31 19:02         ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-04-03 19:24         ` [PATCH v7] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-04-03 20:48           ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-04-07 13:59           ` [PATCH v8] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-04-21 17:44             ` [PATCH v9] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-05-11 17:41               ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha [this message]
2020-05-25 11:46                 ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-06-08 13:58                   ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-06-08 16:52               ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-06-12 15:28               ` [PATCH v10] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-06-25 17:26                 ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-07-06 14:15                   ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha
2020-07-07 20:12                 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-07-10 23:07                   ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2020-07-11 14:45                     ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-11 16:31                       ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-13 23:30                         ` [PATCH] Correct timespec implementation [BZ #26232] H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14  2:35                           ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 11:16                           ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 11:42                             ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 12:04                               ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 12:18                                 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 13:12                                   ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 13:14                                     ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 13:17                                       ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-15 19:38                                         ` Paul Eggert
2020-07-15 19:44                                           ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2020-07-14 13:08                               ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=158921890091.13128.8968594041404693853@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lamm@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).