From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80DD31F453 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:57:59 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=QJvQPbIYNlE+9GtGO4bFqB6ywelRZyVRte8ki2XpSl2 fIV4zev4FKlz2dVoycMSntv5ZFCGgrq43bok+biImcJNs5VaiFr0A6HLOOutcVG5 w7ceUg+7zq3d6ki2JevpvaJ5/Bb1+uEpMDZfTqHhE+pQx8cb5uReQ/z5VH+FZgV4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=lDqjXJ+wQLc8loIRL+WSjQ/tnas=; b=EBKjUIYuQ0SqLobyf /QvGZ0OjVpma+CNXisdteUBmAP4HlHKGnKg3hAAOWKFKEtSJW6oHUeUCtrJ/VeqB pYYcuKtIjY1x1MOL3yRbhK9gbylVzM28By4FKE62R55AwkVOsqlQXh7Ro0K8AGsA z0Oy4XBskVJ3zq0MxVPzHtw58Y= Received: (qmail 4047 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2019 15:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4039 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2019 15:57:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: imap1.codethink.co.uk Message-ID: <1548259069.3229.308.camel@codethink.co.uk> Subject: Re: misc/check-installed-headers-c failing due to upstream kernel change From: Ben Hutchings To: Vineet Gupta , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: Feng Tang , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:57:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4db851ae-9bb2-2159-96bf-c4b34b505bd9@synopsys.com> References: <4db851ae-9bb2-2159-96bf-c4b34b505bd9@synopsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 14:56 -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > It seems a recent upstream kernel change (went in 5.0-rcX) 81c9d43f9487 > ("kernel/sysctl: add panic_print into sysctl") trips one of the glibc tests. > > FAIL: misc/check-installed-headers-c > > > :: sys/sysctl.h > > :::: > > *** Obsolete types detected: > > ~/install/compilers/arc-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/linux /sysctl.h: > > KERN_PANIC_PRINT=78, /* ulong: bitmask to print system info on panic */ > > It doesn't seem to like ulong (inside a comment). I don't have enough foo to fix > it, but wanted to bring it to notice anyways. This additions looks like a mistake, anyway - Linux's binary sysctl interface is only there for ancient compatibility and no new sysctls should be added to this enumeration. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer   Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom