From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3F8208EA for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:55:01 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pjy/4+zxQJzRm2km 8s4pm0Jh0OrxZDIsSVNq4rvethxwGvxpSiPBFXzl6td7x0HtclFIJfBlXrpHUPdo o76OuZVUJXtSnPlImm2Xx9K03Kd21O6db+FAdKcqB97vAnb3Uh76nxqcOqtd+rHP q6icC0IJXu6MiV74WE/XnMchpco= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=fXDqND7hZ1c7QSf6AEyJLy T/IxM=; b=RJ6SJIhw2Dokk/ijqtyjKmw2qnpfvSf+quzKK4rc9ibHwV/aT+3Tvu wutSOnWhskuNxWTwIVnLZ9wW7JYEsEbGvsm/n8jemOJ++6XN9zJJ7t/aP6k4M02l yrTW2PvPCuuzf0aUxti0XSb9stTBJuz5Y8FJ7kJvi7cVyKkDGaDSM= Received: (qmail 35443 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2018 13:54:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 35430 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2018 13:54:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: smtp.707.technology Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h From: Rical Jasan To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: Joseph Myers , Carlos O'Donell , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer References: <1517591084-11347-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <203a3def-74d0-fa66-9792-a587a089a359@linaro.org> <46c7b370-f98d-30a3-9aac-c5e2c5d5e1d0@linaro.org> <00cbaea3-d979-d766-58b1-a4b0822ca678@redhat.com> Message-ID: <15084ee5-8fb2-677c-376d-1647b46623de@2c3t.io> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:54:54 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Should we really be saying "ISO C11" threads everywhere? Would it be appropriate to just say "ISO C"? (I'm thinking about future ISO CXX standards also having specifications for threads.) Rical