From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979611F8C6 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A3B385DC3D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:02:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.68]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43410385842E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:02:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 43410385842E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.ucla.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cs.ucla.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64053160075 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id FF_ZYe44y7O8 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31071600AD for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:02:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6VGxL-jXbP21 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com [172.91.119.151]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5A7A160075 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Update to glibc copyright assignment policy To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <24208780-9ae8-3af2-3da9-8f57ef12e68a@redhat.com> <874kcd2ob4.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <1172b18f-8157-e6b8-ac6a-59cc31e63896@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:02:37 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874kcd2ob4.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 7/29/21 7:21 AM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > I'm worried that this obligation means that we cannot use glibc-specific > facilities in code shared with gnulib. We'll just have to take those problems as they come. I'm not particularly worried about it. If it's an important facility that's portable, we can simply rewrite it for Gnulib and then share back as needed. The main obstacles for sharing will likely continue to be technical, not political/legal.