From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712E120248 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:46:12 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q= dns; s=default; b=xY4+QYORESsKMXul4r2kxf/iql/f+NZcyAnf2oPiKihim3 Kpwtd6SEEbeOXjSauxQ1UC0z+A5U24EPcZnanBKGtB8K69hoTOm53Qt9tQ+mLuRo Tg+k/rlSK56FRE2bTEpI2XoaUf6uVZS6S9iASgp2AANTNV3Cm/qVvVUqLezXM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= default; bh=T+sGZbOw1NCo8zKa8uTYhXCWN2M=; b=szySAo6Js/yqyqdXK9VU wZRhFTsBg05vtGw5bl8kJCIvvIR0MP1oRQ5zV1feF4qO4kfs5EA+ojakmZAxG7Qw WTc3NFbkvJrt2GsYCj0u4giAkA8j4Y0Io3wHxjami/uDPqeiR2mEi4zQizhKj97q L2DtnhPrcKJA+uNojPPx+CQ= Received: (qmail 99848 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2019 10:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99837 invoked by uid 89); 8 Mar 2019 10:46:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: shared-ano163.rev.nazwa.pl Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:47:17 +0100 (CET) From: Rafal Luzynski To: Felix Yan , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Message-ID: <1018020659.74441.1552042037825@poczta.nazwa.pl> In-Reply-To: References: <20190213105150.9323-1-felixonmars@archlinux.org> <20190302171111.18578-1-felixonmars@archlinux.org> <28917729.169388.1551829557828@poczta.nazwa.pl> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] localedata: Add Minguo calendar support to zh_TW [BZ #24293] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 7.03.2019 10:35 Felix Yan wrote: > On 2019/3/6 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=887:45, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > [...] > > Do I see correctly that the content of "era" is the same in all locales= ? > > Please forgive me my ignorance, is this correct despite these are > > different > > languages? >=20 > zh_TW is locale for the writing system of Traditional Chinese in Taiwan, > while the others are for different pronunciation systems. They are > reflecting different aspects (or variants) of the same language. I don't think I understand this paragraph but I believe that you mean that this is correct despite the language difference. Due to my lack of knowledge about Chinese language I am unable to verify this. > I > believe most users uses zh_TW and very few uses the others. The others > can be useful for a TTS system, though. That few people use a language is not a reason not to provide the correct translation. But that's irrelevant since (IIUC) the patch provides correct locale data for all these languages. > I'll correct the issues and send next version shortly. Thank you, I will move to the new version. Regards, Rafal