From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8521F97E for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:00:05 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Obwlikfe7URTL23Y NrTufTtTPTTiiYnitncJnL6ErQ+3QNlzwLDpjUhFYwxAPo056C7bEFBp+skpYkWP QEDOtbsTABXBxvfcCNTQvlfazkGG8RBMf4E956rTgotn25wThFo7U05DWvEWh3Wl tgBXlEiNyCt2JHl/goG1WbLfq30= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=phJLuLQdp4ihu9s0lwr4/q BOAF0=; b=C4V5ZON0pK2spFrm1U6RYp3U80To4HpNRtfA7jW23TQYZAPcL78K5y fOZfBhyy9MoYko1+rHicmCix1Uc+BlJBegGPpc5o5ViQdb6PGc9h7ujr/OxmK1Z1 FQZSmuujOFs5pyOOZ3mCm12ocFJXb5MlohGVBbEeddqbRbSCKb6w8= Received: (qmail 123231 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2018 10:00:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 123177 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2018 10:00:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-wr1-f66.google.com Reply-To: Marko Myllynen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Locales: Cyrillic -> ASCII transliteration table [BZ #2872] v2 To: Egor Kobylkin , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, libc-locales@sourceware.org, mfabian@redhat.com, Rafal Luzynski Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" , Volodymyr Lisivka , Max Kutny , danilo@gnome.org References: <41532e13-a63d-5df1-ab37-05eb4d6c8d0a@kobylkin.com> <20180412224352.GB2911@altlinux.org> From: Marko Myllynen Message-ID: <0f6c3b90-7af5-9575-1d07-aa73ce32f579@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:59:54 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Looks like there's one rule after all which might be debatable, I'll just highlight it and let others to comment and decide what to do with it. On 2018-10-11 01:29, Egor Kobylkin wrote: > > +% RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK > + ; translit_neutral (which is included by i18n) has: % RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK % not because it's often used as an apostrophe In practice the end result might well be the same (since if U+2019 is not available then probably U+2035 is neither and both rules produce U+0027). However, given that translit_cyrillic would be included in every locale, I'm not sure is this kind of minor discrepancy ok or not. Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen