From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682CF1F66F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9597938708FB; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:26:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9597938708FB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1605698775; bh=xaKRTdgINLPmg7qBYh5qNn5IRVR2R2yxTbIKsvvUzcc=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=YDVD3VtLYhDm+imU3+BdOx+otbnu+cx12xsdgzNAqa1NLG0zlTOnx1DvXRqg3sy13 ey5W0ZRDkIPiK1lROfKRghW5SVS2s/nl2U/lgdhP9qVbfRiFgCSYI+CccWsSg5/Iex GvjskL1XeVsxxJI/SPAWGgMoN38ZLl4D+m5t0JnM= Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com (mail-wm1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432CD385800A for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:26:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 432CD385800A Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id p2so840625wma.1 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:26:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xaKRTdgINLPmg7qBYh5qNn5IRVR2R2yxTbIKsvvUzcc=; b=Ho+djlFyYNs+eCB45jomYnBAHCJQJ4m3LOcn3Iba3p4My8Fg2TEgmnPs40FHWq1jRA YYchweOvnIJDuXsbdmYZ9K5wWbtyWv1vpFwyqzwmrzhBvsCPOOEj0S8/KGQev3EHe1hM lws1fvqLkTDsEDw/a0K5qE1KqvoqJb0NIsVaMixo3OUDZRo7zfRPUV/WTmuqb1ZFHzOf snaZck/QNMoeWxueFc4VGswSuaXbcsUa2hUgnekb1Z11JR53H8TQTOymsbseUwAEVjia PJYgqxrEVIXoTdqtCgG9du3p66x8SBgGt6XAp2HEkPEA08LzXE9OCYSkuEJqgz2oJiZP 6h2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yzsLWXn2DoyP3OJqQwvgkyo/YQ8xhBaIILiHjntZVw1DewK4X nB++wacKai3tKBhvKFhSJAI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0yOWornRkpmJ9mzE0ZunmsNiybyS6yx+QXyG1kdv00jMRerVN7G8jVvD34UH8e5bY8wL6hA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c92a:: with SMTP id h10mr2205648wml.138.1605698770468; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([170.253.51.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d128sm3451534wmc.7.2020.11.18.03.26.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:26:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] : Add nitems() To: Joseph Myers References: <20200928191237.32063-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <8fb9c722-4190-6115-1d60-d94f8db7f749@gmail.com> Message-ID: <01e7fc2d-d883-fec7-38cd-0a209dd549ba@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:26:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, ville.voutilainen@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, libc-coord@lists.openwall.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, jwakely@redhat.com, enh@google.com Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 11/18/20 12:11 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> Nice! >> Please update me on any feedback you receive. > > Apparently the author is planning new versions of those papers so WG14 > discussion is waiting for those. > >> So glibc will basically hold this patch >> at least until the WG answers to that, right? > > I think that whether C2x gets an array-size feature of some kind is > relevant to whether such a feature goes in glibc and what it looks like in > glibc, but the fact that it will be considered in WG14 doesn't rule out > glibc considering such a feature without waiting for WG14. > Hi Joseph, Yes, that's what I would expect, but it's been a long time since I sent the patch, so that's why I asked. Maybe glibc is busy now with other more urgent things, I don't know. Thanks, Alex