From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FDD61F953 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60E6385801B for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:14:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D60E6385801B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1638270860; bh=YjndD9fFmmGCtMmwEgonVuNDeU+PeBTuj7j+5bl8Dr4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=o3XFZ02O+2BWwlfcMFWtPxk3Vfo0uDVCyjWRpFt2CrFacJYfuiPpPUH511G2EOGQF lSJtESHop8MbdLmDMh5u97nlLhrziuQN3Ia0BOG1sW3G8vRnlrKHXk0mBp7A+irjnU 7IvU+/uJF+PFQ8jA0IdU62OXMJgRV55G1B20NBsQ= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6663858C2C; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:14:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9A6663858C2C Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1AUAMLnl020614; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:57 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cnj55rwtn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:57 +0000 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1AUAsbbf017593; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:57 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cnj55rwsx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1AUBD3iM019755; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:54 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ckcacdtq2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:54 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1AUBDpqE12255670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:51 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB17EA4053; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787D3A4055; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.145.180.36] (unknown [9.145.180.36]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:13:51 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <0113351c-7308-1eea-e826-144c78d5576f@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:13:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: glibc build failure due to Systemtap probe change Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Hudson-Doyle , Florian Weimer References: <87a6i4e9ej.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <1830a8cb-e52e-aa03-b8dc-9dda2d697582@redhat.com> <87a6i383j9.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87czmy6bc3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TaOjRTX6OlOZb59sTPMWtxXGmLpe7TFa X-Proofpoint-GUID: hNAEz1OdFxgiefcr4o1W8E6Eo4PaG7yT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-11-30_07,2021-11-28_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2111300064 X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Stefan Liebler via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Stefan Liebler Cc: Arjun Shankar , Stan Cox , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, systemtap@sourceware.org Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 25/11/2021 02:55, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi, On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha > wrote: * Stan Cox: >> Is there a way way to > use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the template? >> There's no type > inspection in ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha > > wrote: > > * Stan Cox: > > >> Is there a way way to use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the > template? > >> There's no type inspection in assembler, after all. > > > > Can you send me the failing .i file so I can experiment with it? > > --save-temps did not work for me for some reason, so I'm attaching -E > and -E -fdirectives-only output. > > I think I got Fedora rawhide s390x building again, so it's not *very* > time-critical, but I really don't want to release Fedora 36 with our own > private copy of .  But that release still some months away. > > > Is there any update on this? I just ran into it with my snapshot build > for Ubuntu. I can borrow/steal Florian's fix for now too but I too would > prefer not to release 22.04 with it... > > Cheers, > mwh  As information: This also happens on Fedora 35 with systemtap-sdt-devel-4.6-1.fc35. @Stan: Do you have any news with your experiments? Bye, Stefan