From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC3F1F597 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:44:09 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Uxox8NjPv3qqx9t/ n9X0T6G6/b6KOQs4zdowzQb+dvmsDjKAgl/7JjyCIVPGyMNni9vBouWKLfxrY0bN dikxBoyMLwC4k7HOyjXnKUFHt61tnTWFnibjFj7hZTUZjt5MsGsiX5ZKW29j0bM6 2m0k5j+cxzVGDt4ZYDC2wDNcXxo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=XDv0LRh+c8RyDU3VpVct+q hn1P4=; b=E44xSyI+lyf1WaYZf6pW1/NlHtmMYvYk56wYvzPjRPHLvI1yk3Ynw7 NWyCXeN/loSpRFMivXrcxcCu007npGWRUa16bx4mOPk9IxDjHMzb62swHGPYMQMe jUWCRfcFu0xB8TDtx8TDxY52xzNeIlyT7wpheQeU2Wdqf/ttLb3lo= Received: (qmail 53331 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2018 18:44:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 53288 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2018 18:44:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-qk0-f195.google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h To: Adhemerval Zanella , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: Florian Weimer References: <1517591084-11347-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <203a3def-74d0-fa66-9792-a587a089a359@linaro.org> <46c7b370-f98d-30a3-9aac-c5e2c5d5e1d0@linaro.org> From: Carlos O'Donell Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <00cbaea3-d979-d766-58b1-a4b0822ca678@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:43:58 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46c7b370-f98d-30a3-9aac-c5e2c5d5e1d0@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/19/2018 01:46 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > Florian, > > First thanks for the thoroughly review for c11 threads so far. I think it > has covered most the upcoming rough pieces. > > Carlos, do you think we can squeeze this for 2.28? As you put private, I > also don't think we will get a 'pristine' implementation with optimal > object sizes without a refactor of internal nptl implementation. Yes, I'd like to see Intel CET, C11 threads, and malloc hook removal land in this release. It seems to me like ISO C threads.h is ready, were there any more objections? Have we double checked with Joseph? -- Cheers, Carlos.