From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] submodule deinit: require '--all' instead of '.' for all submodules Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 14:43:51 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1462321992-15153-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1462324785-26389-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jonathan Nieder , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jens Lehmann To: Stefan Beller X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 04 23:44:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ay4aP-0003rd-2C for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 23:44:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753692AbcEDVnz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2016 17:43:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54443 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753191AbcEDVnz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2016 17:43:55 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094A219250; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:43:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DShtNTVvYjBlTkGxQpHPHksWDos=; b=Oyq6fZ 67yqkRkoq5OSRMpCT0nfB334MeDQcLhyy+DOmVEBfxVlBjm7/xggkNqWjFhkNogN 85L2cgjqmZHyxC2H/3DthQj/3Lqt0uCGt5gQnlSu8nqweZeNwtlfizwDbutvRSDw BK4eVqaTC4AmBIAS15YiazDkc/czLTdMkSH9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=hjDJVMCLOjmcVNMRxNn3T+ebTrI2DbCk 7TYSgyGgO3Rgbal0mmUq32JCzY3T9oHHnJEL3RVyDnvJXy7dehqbhvVgFEJfyM/+ Kjv0w+7F4G6rM12gE/SxJ5dVZ0nSJOFSjns4fVYL9DE9NH1ATXk65Pz38OVm9Qlz YjJz3l29pXw= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0113A1924F; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:43:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7695B1924E; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:43:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Wed, 4 May 2016 14:34:11 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4BC8E354-1241-11E6-A920-D05A70183E34-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stefan Beller writes: > (e.g. work tree for working tree?) This was probably primarily my fault, not just because I've written more than my share of documentation (compared to the code that touched), but I was deliberately writing "work tree" when both "work tree" and "working tree" terms meant the same thing. Compared to the length of the timeperiod, the newcomer who is now known as "worktree" has only lived a very short period of time, so it is not surprising to see remaining "work tree" in our documentation set. I think some attempts like 06cdac5a (git-reset.txt: use "working tree" consistently, 2010-09-15) were made to clean things up even before "worktree" started to mean an entirely different thing, and we shouldn't make things worse by adding mentions of "work tree" when we mean "working tree".