From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763BB1FBEC for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933174AbdCJTiR (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:38:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51067 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755351AbdCJTiO (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:38:14 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64927670B2; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:38:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=bcZYpnXDJG0w3RagNQDLetuTqRU=; b=IARohP 3TXdGaT0CRkM3O6fTw+T5pVIydcdZU8vfHz35LeP8ycFWspijYEt2r0zA2HtikSf 7+Y26r0GLCBi7BLibZ7+dSBCAAI4PR/3uwdk9RzGfHdpQusTYgW+S6gG/quImRVy VhpmO4WxLnE+F0afVjJIo9GDLaqj71ecCZbDQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=m7lLcYp0TxyT9fXXjQY2QLJ3G6jOP+bn NCrDNw3Vzt08sLWw5C0P7orPvpLDXQfZPotN/imY6+2zniK0BzmNluX/aqe4Bm1E /CKNYNpffv1fLWpmCOLmozsDOb6xRlyRGpqNFyPsIwl9Sfo4zMooHbHKMyf1H2xe pi+vHEZvYi4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9A3670B0; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:38:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3574670AB; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:38:11 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Brandon Williams , Jeff Hostetler , Jeff Hostetler , git@vger.kernel.org, markbt@efaref.net, benpeart@microsoft.com, jonathantanmy@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special References: <1488994685-37403-1-git-send-email-jeffhost@microsoft.com> <1488994685-37403-3-git-send-email-jeffhost@microsoft.com> <1c38ffbc-e4a2-32e5-d324-506c2111043e@jeffhostetler.com> <20170309070438.r5g2h5vlmgzds4kp@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170310175823.GA53198@google.com> <20170310180341.bbzukqrj2zlkje2b@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:10 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170310180341.bbzukqrj2zlkje2b@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:03:41 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18A55120-05C9-11E7-BCBB-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I think we ended up deciding that it would be better to just disallow > symlink .gitattributes (and .git*) from entering the index, the way we > disallow ".git". Hmph, I thought we would need both, though. Or do we specifically want to honor untracked .gitattributes that is left as a symlink pointing to elsewhere in the filesystem or something like that?