Re: [PATCH] push: comment on a funny unbalanced option help

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:

> Am 02.08.2018 um 18:54 schrieb Jeff King:
>> PS I actually would have made the rule simply "does it begin with a
>>     '<'", which seems simpler still. If people accidentally write "<foo",
>>     forgetting to close their brackets, that is a bug under both the
>>     old and new behavior (just with slightly different outcomes).
>
> Good point.

Straying sideways into a tangent, but do we know if any locale wants
to use something other than "<>" as an enclosing braket around a
placeholder?  This arg-help text, for example,

	N_("refspec")			without LIT-ARG-HELP

would be irritating for such a locale's translator, who cannot
defeat the "<>" that is hardcoded and not inside _()

	s = literal ? "%s" : "<%s>";
                        
that appear in parse-options.c::usage_argh().

Perhaps we should do _("<%s>") here?  That way, the result would
hopefully be made consistent with

	N_("<refspec>[:<expect>]")	with LIT-ARG-HELP

which allows translator to use the bracket of the locale's choice.