From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CD41F5AE for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727016AbgG2SZe (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59465 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726385AbgG2SZe (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0811361EB8; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:25:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fKzgbCj77nI6vYXpFI7Ys4kmXDk=; b=GLRN54 t1/nyGIaQjI4o0dWwxPgQCh/RrtG0t88/fO9YsL+DRpUhDks+SHpp89IRm6D5aJX +XNSbPvzstuF4mFiUswkITbT7QeeIDzL8AtXuSumJ0Tdke1mAO2xeTq5Gnc6Su/C Ebv96yFY/y9lGAgAoM9C12m/GSFJJOKRsdevk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YPKEgmiKTzfIJuAP42NJMwFk5sTR2bbc 4mgldYPjFn1NBCL+lYkhpfKRENg9VIklf/V7rahSinJO8JlPbwnBajkTNj1xqHwi ZZ/JhiwAolEOP46dOl2a7cTswUowNIX0GgU3Z/KtKHznRM2DtKZ0kaAveHRUlNro YIyPKaYiPX0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A7561EB5; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:25:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81DDB61EB3; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:25:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Carmen Andoh Cc: Kaartic Sivaraam , Taylor Blau , Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: 24 hours to respond with date/duration preferences for inclusion summit References: <20200726040226.GA19030@dcvr> <20200727151023.GB62919@syl.lan> <20200728100726.GA24408@dcvr> <20200728162528.GH87373@syl.lan> <6b4b3f77-a479-4d7b-d7c2-e3e35e658ac7@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:25:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Carmen Andoh's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:00:00 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E2B63226-D1C8-11EA-A116-2F5D23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Carmen Andoh writes: > Hello All, > > Just a reminder that you have another day to respond to whenisgood > [1]. Note that times are listed as 6AM-9PM (21:00) Pacific. Please > specify duration preferences ( half days, full days, etc) in > comments. Hopefully we'll respond soon after that with date/s that > works for most. Sorry for sending this on the last day. After re-reading the original announcement and the above part, I am wondering if responding to the "when is the good time for you?" poll is a requirement to be invited. My tentative understanding is that this is merely to help resolove scheduling conflicts, and those who want to attend but have no particular time/date preference can just stay silent and wait for the invitation to come, to which they are required to respond via e-mail in order to attend. I suspect many people are wondering about the same thing and a bit of clarification may help. Thanks.