From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6C81F5AE for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726606AbgG2VKe (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64599 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726476AbgG2VKe (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBF180D27; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GB41pIUVIyYdUZgUSy13U0f214Y=; b=H34h8B 14epq2P4UfjNnmJLM0xxTBIIX1RT9LERpgMqBo9kfueovK6p84aijZKw75cq/4tQ TXrut08L4dW+2fUzyPbsq7IRwqbbZprv37JEHQyROqNv7QUOtmMh7atm1lQGno0m vs7pYGtdC+1y0B+sHN6kfUVfdl2syHiQAmlmo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=C1wtXDBP7SA5OdIHLbiMPZHEYWFbWysq 7E7iCLdbq+C7wsexcbHVLcKwYrVp+F3umZRUiwaYzJbn1twpInshLAhzPiGnvNuG xrVvKZdD/wLiQhcIxPQxy00l+UuZ4yXxZCguQgPFmqKVCBjM0iLbScnN2oFZEK6N p3Ty4bFWoB0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659CB80D26; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E61A580D25; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Chris Torek Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] doc/git-log: move "-t" into diff-options list References: <20200729201002.GA2989059@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200729201210.GF2989342@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:10:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200729201210.GF2989342@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:12:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EFD0F376-D1DF-11EA-80B9-01D9BED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > The "-t" option is infrequently used; it doesn't deserve a spot near the > top of the options list. Let's push it down into the diff-options > include, near the definition of --raw. True. It does not have any effect unless --raw is in use (i.e. it does have an effect to "git show --patch-with-raw" or anything that (also) shows "--raw" output), and it makes sense to have "-t" near "--raw".