From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C541F66F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730480AbgKJBnq (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:43:46 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:53045 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725889AbgKJBnk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:43:40 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370BD94047; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:43:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=KQNA2VipPQlEnbX/eux8L8l3uho=; b=WX2dug d7SYfYu/j14b5TGsound3YxIu9jPvlhchJf2eEV6w94eWakfS9Ywf6x6hE4gj8TQ T3CteSacPXvX640bYdi+MH1V3KApx8aYRVmXolgD5heHarn9lCcSiCrhelTcB7Dk MMdr7Diqy3Rfu61q/UE85mSWuCrA9epgTodCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JWMU/+294tRo8jG/6gu5eUj/iJHjP+M6 ODcMOQBPeWpjBFZ7FngK502mqOoLXRyY0qRqE34y6+psKii982LAoKhI3wsEWowO XOz4n2hIP4RrC/RL1lqWcOKl1bi7wJYbcW7vwZblNZHOFi+FQNCRQUOEVYZ1MIIs uTPsgPS84fc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E78694045; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:43:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A607F94040; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:43:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Git List , Eric Sunshine , Hu Keping , zhengjunling@huawei.com, zhuangbiaowei@huawei.com, Patrick Hemmer , Rafael Ascensao , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: make output filename configurable References: <20201105201548.2333425-1-hukeping@huawei.com> <20201105150149.GA107127@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20201110002312.GA1267848@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:43:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20201110002312.GA1267848@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:23:12 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 270744FA-22F6-11EB-B8FC-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:23:48AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> @@ -1822,6 +1825,7 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >> init_display_notes(¬es_opt); >> git_config(git_format_config, NULL); >> repo_init_revisions(the_repository, &rev, prefix); >> + rev.subject_prefix = fmt_patch_subject_prefix; >> rev.show_notes = show_notes; >> memcpy(&rev.notes_opt, ¬es_opt, sizeof(notes_opt)); >> rev.commit_format = CMIT_FMT_EMAIL; >> @@ -1831,7 +1835,6 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >> rev.diff = 1; >> rev.max_parents = 1; >> rev.diffopt.flags.recursive = 1; >> - rev.subject_prefix = fmt_patch_subject_prefix; >> memset(&s_r_opt, 0, sizeof(s_r_opt)); >> s_r_opt.def = "HEAD"; >> s_r_opt.revarg_opt = REVARG_COMMITTISH; > > It's not clear to me what these hunks are doing. I'm trying really hard > to find some subtle reason that we need to init this field sooner, but I > can't. It really looks like it might be leftover noise. It indeed was leftover noise and has nothing to do with the output filename length configurablility (I suspect it is a true no-op). Thanks.