From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA551F4B4 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231804AbhDNVms (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:42:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:60677 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232094AbhDNVmr (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:42:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247A011A3E3; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:42:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=p/wbAZiDZtwP7mc/3tyMT+e9Xg8=; b=PBXTwf /FcK98mUeBVRyrRCQy1RxhbKWfZHDuRcJAXhi8h+fqxlMHDtRIPBw7NbYFD55oao l/x2o4mwWfOeWXrF6dGMJIE6fwf5wRTkwaOTcoc7cb4LK/x2/paY56oxaCQPt6/j XEa+Awlz9KvdZnlvl6tDE3231b7v7552gLXbI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Qt5QF/WEZcQ0VwFENQQnVXI0FZ6r0XRC 6+3NqV3dKIA999cw4FWugKl/3A8V3D6e8Omn4cs6A/L5duwIUE2dVirVmKWBQlv6 Em5nlPulXgkdAznOUsGgxqh2YYIjoTe2CmpX+jsXQchJZiM8BlZ/6WqSraYHZrR2 yq3S34eClSg= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2E611A3E2; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:42:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60ACD11A3E1; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:42:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Nieder Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , Raxel Gutierrez , mricon@kernel.org, patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org, Taylor Blau , Emily Shaffer , Git Users Subject: Re: Pain points in Git's patch flow References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:42:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:02:58 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4C1F050E-9D6A-11EB-B252-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > So, I dunno. We seem to suffer from the same lack of good starter > tasks before each GSoC begins. And long after sending the response, I realize that this has very little to do with "Git's patch flow" issue that you wanted to discuss. Helping newbies wet their toes may be a topic worth discussing, but that is not the focus of this thread. Let me send a response to describe my pain points separately. Sorry for the noise.