From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3645A1F5AE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235118AbhFIHSd (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:18:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:64560 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232746AbhFIHSd (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:18:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA4A1473C5; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:16:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=fMMPKoXBoUnB 91ysrldZEpdCYKF3AspdY9pm0v7Bd0c=; b=kbS3Ph7goLibVC6keUqHwojz6FC/ a79s5r+PbWR3pf3fdZO5mLwVcaprDxPXEqrCWmUB13z8wPbrnpOn0hkgJ16AlRyx P3lKEvaLjTE+HkxXxD0T6fpwJda+Fy3Nafn026GMnnmm7WpYyULcIN3RN0SseUv5 1faRcdXXK7TukOc= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6DC1473C4; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:16:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65F2A1473C3; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:16:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: ZheNing Hu Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget , Git List , Christian Couder , Hariom Verma , Bagas Sanjaya Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom References: Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:16:34 +0900 In-Reply-To: (ZheNing Hu's message of "Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:55:43 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A071091E-C8F2-11EB-BF1D-D5C30F5B5667-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org ZheNing Hu writes: > It=E2=80=99s worth mentioning that this patch still fails the github CI= test. [1] > > t6300-for-each-ref.sh: > 274: Verify sorts with raw > 275: Verify sorts with raw:size > 278: empty raw refs with %(if) > > There is no such breakage on my local machine. > > [1] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/976/checks?check_run_id=3D= 2774963705 It's one of the two 32-bit jobs, I think. If the other one fails the same way, that means the code does not work on 32-bit systems, most likely something in your code assumes certain types are 64-bit when they aren't.