From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E391F428 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 21:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=epRfp0Ci; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231299AbjCIVcr (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:32:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230434AbjCIVcm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:32:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE20102855 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:32:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 132so1898891pgh.13 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:32:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678397545; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ivLAuhgKt26yKa2dpdtJc+N1RaPiJ61yfKxWbGyszBM=; b=epRfp0CiD0e+TGpZlsS9Qlcv+UFp7gpcrWt2UmKyOOzRJ5j0Ijv4cTynXb7lyaUoCz DXIvpBQCpJjQRaI3qBaaMLxgNyd9QupU3Ln3vXfGUTYH9bkv66G9ZBtcbbXPF+W+m51v 1R1eABCUsclncZkdM7zB37miUIHJPlsqHZHnMfLof4ayzpaF37KzSOqKxau/zcSEBb3a szF/h/8rzJv8DldoPKQGZ615rBVblmwb7dXzX9DumtL+75rzvY2Gan8VZrDkZozFyrl+ xXcoJR92V1Y6ISS11xELvclxwLTdV4Ks3EjYhXpWxMymrBcb7f8a6theLKTyEoayIFj1 bCFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678397545; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ivLAuhgKt26yKa2dpdtJc+N1RaPiJ61yfKxWbGyszBM=; b=rjR4yyDYnEbDwq6rIZVXxTxWGswyiJkJ7rtpfzZ+zuSY2cTRIamgTIdKzhKmIxDwKg ksxRxI9nlQ+tZ0GNIfdsteG4YvFPiD6XlLgR7s8YDHwtJQFC1gFpqDpFrPuVbzGVvowF Ju32/flnvlHXO0Jy0izayUfX2XpUar/dO0jjVfQrSAS9IfU20cQbFqynS6VGEQdskQMP AeEPaRaNtkHrpDG4OhRmDEjuZRWW1/2PuK76cSpKEPLUNwMMvhms8uNVOHnZ4p2rqhOh L9sX7ANlnT0J/uSniIPF32bYSd2LHsQVqPkGN3UkJZpbPWWuE8fWZOGE0ihLtWfC1Auy Ve7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXSQD1dxZRIR5fIZFYFmOSZX2tj8Rq1yylafJSwaxkNgnrdost2 yChFGEqHDadMwJec+o7H0qlGdskr1Do= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8dn7K9yU+qCCbykIqvagf1pdBe8HfsolJvC0AhfZk82cpHRwnG/da/gJLHaP69J7RqDeKRjg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:96d8:0:b0:5ef:b4e1:db0e with SMTP id h24-20020aa796d8000000b005efb4e1db0emr19674663pfq.16.1678397545506; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (83.92.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.92.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10-20020a63fa0a000000b00502f4c62fd3sm64015pgh.33.2023.03.09.13.32.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:32:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Wong Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fetch: pass --no-write-fetch-head to subprocesses References: <20230308100438.908471-1-e@80x24.org> <20230308222205.M679514@dcvr> <20230308234857.M503278@dcvr> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:32:24 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20230308234857.M503278@dcvr> (Eric Wong's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2023 23:48:57 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Wong writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Junio C Hamano writes: >> >> > I think we should instead enumerate submodule repositories, instead >> > of enumerating existing .git/FETCH_HEAD files. >> >> Perhaps something along this line? > > Sure, can you squash it into mine? Thanks. Heh, I left it at "something along this line" because I didn't want to debug it myself, or think about the longer-term ramifications when the tests before this part eventually change in the future. I've squashed it in and merged the result to 'next', together with a few other topics. Thanks.