From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix prune/gc problem with multiple worktrees
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:44:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy46ntrhk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <575017FF.1020901@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:26:55 +0200")
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> Fixing reachability via the index and detached HEADs feels relatively
> important.
> ...
I agree with the order of importance above. But "relatively" is a
very good keyword. Just like bisection refs, what is in the index
and the commit detached HEAD points at are expected to be tentative.
As a part of still-experimental feature, I'd rather see our
bandwidth spent on fixing it the right way first time, instead of
piling on an unproven quick-fix as a band aid, having to rip it off
and fixing it properly later.
> It's hard for me to predict when the ref-iterator stuff will be merged.
> It is a big change, but so far the feedback seems pretty good. I can
> tell you that pushing it and ref-stores forward is high on my priority list.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 7:07 git gc and worktrees Johannes Sixt
2016-05-31 12:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-05-31 22:14 ` Jeff King
2016-06-01 7:00 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-06-01 8:57 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-01 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-01 16:12 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-01 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-02 4:08 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-03 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix prune/gc problem with multiple worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] revision.c: move read_cache() out of add_index_objects_to_pending() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] reachable.c: mark reachable objects in index from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-01 18:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-06-02 9:35 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-01 18:57 ` David Turner
2016-06-02 9:37 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] reachable.c: mark reachable detached HEAD " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] reachable.c: make reachable reflogs for all per-worktree reflogs Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-01 15:51 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-01 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix prune/gc problem with multiple worktrees Jeff King
2016-06-01 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-02 9:53 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-02 11:26 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-02 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy46ntrhk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).