From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: Link to "git describe"'d commits in log messages
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:01:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy42l874n.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba9d9c82-4b5e-4d62-95f1-a1c56cfc70af@gmail.com> ("Jakub Narębski"'s message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:49:23 +0200")
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
>> When I saw 2/3 I wondered about one thing and 3/3 shares the same,
>> which is that we only use regex match and do not validate for a
>> false match. Would it be too expensive...
>
> It's a matter of balance between false positives (and unresolving
> links) and performance...
Yes, and that is why I asked a simple yes-or-no question. Would it
be too expensive? Your answer seems to be yes.
Have we measured? Is that really a bottleneck? Would it help to
update parse_commits to call a new command "gitweb--helper" that
produces the result of what git_print_log would have done to its
$log argument, for example?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-21 11:44 [PATCH 1/3] gitweb: Fix an ancient typo in v1.7.7-rc1-1-g0866786 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] gitweb: Link to 7-character SHA1SUMS in commit messages Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 16:26 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 18:04 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 18:28 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 20:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: Link to "git describe"'d commits in log messages Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-21 17:49 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-09-21 17:09 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 17:58 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 19:13 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] gitweb: Fix an ancient typo in v1.7.7-rc1-1-g0866786 Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 14:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-09-21 17:14 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-09-21 17:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy42l874n.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).