From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F85920986 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S944266AbcJSSO0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:14:26 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52998 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S944216AbcJSSOY (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:14:24 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFBA46F2E; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:14:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qOIdK2iowVv1LmaB5Vsq54Yhg54=; b=dmOQJa G13gH1PUyC9ZGwRaSg/fl6+OiQJ5AREkYkzZYajpq2mif/Yw934lYPfJ8g29Ar8L /55nqmiQl9xpG3eqfG+oYiMDhvP+J6zVUGIV7K2iAAVkrIANRQ9H6ZGBL+dHGrNu MJXs+g+ANHok05+lCRLlzBkhsKktq905wB/qU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WvYT3vclu+eHNFCHMY2HQc8FDP2SVGQ6 n8S5ahOdPVn1wLTquHtblKqScKkcJLVL04mmI7cJld6O9gDCsrY17XotG7N8nby1 h0qYIjEmlAg9r8XKirbqoWpj/dD9LqIeQLfQfJbK/0+/lKdwigzEd6iuM1bRJuFB 2LD88Xv+W9Q= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5471046F2C; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:14:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9AD446F2B; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:14:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Vasco Almeida Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jiang Xin , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= AVILA , Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Na?= =?utf-8?Q?r=C4=99bski?= , David Aguilar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/14] i18n: add--interactive: mark strings for translation References: <20161010125449.7929-1-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> <20161005172110.30801-1-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> <20161010125449.7929-2-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:14:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161010125449.7929-2-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> (Vasco Almeida's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:54:36 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D8F29A4E-9627-11E6-AA34-987C12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Vasco Almeida writes: > } else { > - print "No untracked files.\n"; > + print __("No untracked files.\n"); > } Not a big deal, but this makes me wonder if we want to do this instead print __("No untracked files.") . "\n"; so that translators do not have to remember to keep the final LF. It seems there are some more hits of strings that end with "\n" inside __(...) in this patch, so it probably is OK.