From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1996720286 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 06:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751119AbdILGqY (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:46:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65237 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbdILGqX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:46:23 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8F7A7125; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:46:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uWiynFgGbgB3+rFuoivQJS8ysB0=; b=JsgBBr gA3GozKX5l01v9/rvZFSwPoQuX2b76pJYiQk0HZz+RyYDtQvjLoJM/mnST65rC8g l/YtEqSktpa8/I5k+OqrwrejrYhVZ2v5gjKuOarqLkl1+HY5zAnhFAdbX0OxbR6N gAHSS9VpN8II88aeNiq4tQCiLpZv+3HYTV2Aw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Px+itVvCozGMGr5oRbAOwvJxKpDD51T3 FvXzr8cGfKmHjoqWbiPmB+NT4rhvcFn36N5ZY1yskPhQmdFPgj/ZrIXB8MRI85QD ayM8v1IIljMOtE9M3+jZF0K/xocPuQv1GVW3o8mZeofOQzLExk6KjRh/GTQ9Zbiu N9UX9S3+FeY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4BA7124; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26DC4A7123; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:46:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin , Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] imap-send: use curl by default References: <71479602-fabc-1861-124b-90b26b952344@morey-chaisemartin.com> <20170807200126.fnbz57qd44vj43c6@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:46:20 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20170807200126.fnbz57qd44vj43c6@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:01:26 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 16C87D92-9786-11E7-877A-9D2B0D78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:04:05PM +0200, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin > > Thanks for moving forward with this. > > Can you please flesh out your commit messages with some of the reasoning > and related discussion? I know from a nearby thread why we want to flip > the default, but people reading `git log` much later will not have that > context. > ... I was sweeping my mailbox to collect loose ends that haven't been tied down, and noticed that this topic does not seem to reach a conclusion. Do we want to reboot the effort? Or should we just throw it in the #leftoverbits bin for now? Thanks.