From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB83D20A40 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752499AbdLCAsj (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:48:39 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57591 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751533AbdLCAsi (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:48:38 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289B9B8716; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:48:38 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=pUc96LpBoO1D7eUjMY55XgWTiZI=; b=rF47lf tpTMkUm8Coj1g1jy6DMfx9gskVuxEx45xEu8P6K1CeOcyZmZswbzXZQpLcxbI6OC FouAF614cbdo5w3B9pzWNLZbJTg+jflvcN+49pOmBTUZ8rVUrhCSCIuNPtUfaAGd CBuKIeg6KCrTKgk+7sSNsE67W3LWpITlmBkSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xgF2dhBdftMrgaR8KdIJufj40vQsIT2j SpY9AdB92uUpFkQFyHeqxk7xyTlga9cCnDkSmlIlHmUaVVy0TpEiEl6A48qrfK4J h+q8GI1ukFYxqKu5sDNktwTf6gf8ZDeHWH/Wkz0LFW1PB1I9fK0xJXZ4ej6fpIMT oqzaL3pLK10= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE51B8715; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:48:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 797D1B8714; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:48:37 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Max Kirillov Cc: Eric Sunshine , Jeff King , Florian Manschwetus , Chris Packham , Konstantin Khomoutov , "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] http-backend: respect CONTENT_LENGTH as specified by rfc3875 References: <20171126193813.12531-1-max@max630.net> <20171129050730.GG26158@jessie.local> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 16:48:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20171129050730.GG26158@jessie.local> (Max Kirillov's message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:07:30 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B2C2B06E-D7C3-11E7-8E01-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Max Kirillov writes: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:02:10PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> To recap (other than the typofix in the proposed log message), here >> is what I would have as SQUASH??? on top of (or interspersed with) >> v6. > > Thank you. I'll update it a bit later. May/should I add > "Signed-off-by:" from you? As you'd be dropping the new helper, I think you will not use a major part of that message. But even if you would, a "Helped-by:" before your sign-off should be enough for a small "help" like the one in the message you are responding. Thanks.