git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, newren@gmail.com,
	Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] commit-reach: implement get_reachable_subset
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:35:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy3aeyehs.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c0c5c9143a757ee5187ae6fca9a76f29b6c6ae2.1540908961.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:16:04 -0700 (PDT)")

"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> +struct commit_list *get_reachable_subset(struct commit **from, int nr_from,
> +					 struct commit **to, int nr_to,
> +					 int reachable_flag)

This is OR'ed into object.flags, and I somoehow expected to see it
as 'unsigned int', not a signed one.

> +{
> +	struct commit **item;
> +	struct commit *current;
> +	struct commit_list *found_commits = NULL;
> +	struct commit **to_last = to + nr_to;
> +	struct commit **from_last = from + nr_from;
> +	uint32_t min_generation = GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY;
> +	int num_to_find = 0;
> +
> +	struct prio_queue queue = { compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date };
> +
> +	for (item = to; item < to_last; item++) {
> +		struct commit *c = *item;
> +		
> +		parse_commit(c);
> +		if (c->generation < min_generation)
> +			min_generation = c->generation;
> +
> +		if (!(c->object.flags & PARENT1)) {
> +			c->object.flags |= PARENT1;
> +			num_to_find++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	for (item = from; item < from_last; item++) {
> +		struct commit *c = *item;
> +		if (!(c->object.flags & PARENT2)) {
> +			c->object.flags |= PARENT2;
> +			parse_commit(c);
> +
> +			prio_queue_put(&queue, *item);
> +		}
> +	}

OK, we marked "to" with PARENT1 and counted them in num_to_find
without dups.  We also marked "from" with PARENT2 and threw them in
the "queue" without dups.

Mental note: the caller must guarantee that everybody reachable from
"to" and "from" have PARENT1 and PARENT2 clear.  This might deserve
to be in the comment before the function.

> +	while (num_to_find && (current = prio_queue_get(&queue)) != NULL) {
> +		struct commit_list *parents;
> +
> +		if (current->object.flags & PARENT1) {
> +			current->object.flags &= ~PARENT1;
> +			current->object.flags |= reachable_flag;
> +			commit_list_insert(current, &found_commits);
> +			num_to_find--;

What is in "queue" are all reachable from "from" so we found this
object in the "to" set is reachable.  One down.

> +		}
> +
> +		for (parents = current->parents; parents; parents = parents->next) {
> +			struct commit *p = parents->item;
> +
> +			parse_commit(p);
> +
> +			if (p->generation < min_generation)
> +				continue;

Any commit reachable from "from" whose generation is too small
(i.e. old) can never reach any of "to", because all "to" are at
generation "min_generation" or greater.  Makes sense.

> +			if (p->object.flags & PARENT2)
> +				continue;

If the object is painted with PARENT2, we know we have it in queue
and traversing to find more of its ancestors.  Avoid recursing into
it twice.  Makes sense.

> +			p->object.flags |= PARENT2;
> +			prio_queue_put(&queue, p);

Otherwise, explore this parent.

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	clear_commit_marks_many(nr_to, to, PARENT1);

Among "to", the ones that were not found still have PARENT1.
Because we do not propagate this flag down the ancestry chain like
merge-base discovery, this only has to clear just one level.

> +	clear_commit_marks_many(nr_from, from, PARENT2);

And then we smudged everything that are reachable from "from"
with this flag.  In the worst case, i.e. when num_to_find is still
positive here, we would have painted all commits down to the root,
and we need to clear all of them.

> +	return found_commits;
> +}

OK, this all makes sense.  Unlike merge-base traversals, this does
not have to traverse from the "to" side at all, which makes it quite
simpler and straight-forward.

I do wonder if we can now reimplement in_merge_bases_many() in terms
of this helper, and if that gives us a better performance.  It asks
"is 'commit', i.e. a single 'to', an ancestor of, i.e. reachable
from, one of the 'references', i.e.  'from'"?

> diff --git a/commit-reach.h b/commit-reach.h
> index 7d313e297..43bd50a70 100644
> --- a/commit-reach.h
> +++ b/commit-reach.h
> @@ -74,4 +74,14 @@ int can_all_from_reach_with_flag(struct object_array *from,
>  int can_all_from_reach(struct commit_list *from, struct commit_list *to,
>  		       int commit_date_cutoff);
>  
> +
> +/*
> + * Return a list of commits containing the commits in the 'to' array
> + * that are reachable from at least one commit in the 'from' array.
> + * Also add the given 'flag' to each of the commits in the returned list.
> + */
> +struct commit_list *get_reachable_subset(struct commit **from, int nr_from,
> +					 struct commit **to, int nr_to,
> +					 int reachable_flag);
> +
>  #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-31  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-30 14:16 [PATCH 0/3] Make add_missing_tags() linear Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-10-30 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit-reach: implement get_reachable_subset Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-10-31  3:35   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-10-31 12:01     ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02  1:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-31  6:07   ` Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 11:54     ` Derrick Stolee
2018-10-30 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] test-reach: test get_reachable_subset Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-10-30 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] remote: make add_missing_tags() linear Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-10-31  3:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] Make " Junio C Hamano
2018-10-31  6:04 ` Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 12:05   ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01  6:52     ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-01 12:32       ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01 18:57         ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-01 19:02           ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 14:58             ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 15:38               ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-11-02 13:14   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] commit-reach: implement get_reachable_subset Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-11-02 13:14   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] test-reach: test get_reachable_subset Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-11-02 13:14   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] remote: make add_missing_tags() linear Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqy3aeyehs.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).