From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1AF1F462 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388135AbfFJRbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:31:39 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50741 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387456AbfFJRbi (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:31:38 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF3A16216F; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:31:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uowyQL/fwyROvm7SHlHW/cOlkhk=; b=uuudOZ Dw1k+a5NTfaAsbSC+6oxVs9s0dA/W7bBBdpdLUErBa9H3zugDqLQfVmLBAIiBoqh 7dfPtXaaI8wNUQ/NNKmfqO6OR0S/yw/lA8KsfDgA8rSRRbV917dkzUQLbHHkokUy G5wpHHGjJiDGNkw9/L52UFo4u6mlhmI8ShI8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=u6OdeExDdAWDHEaxJXI6OV5iPPq6MmEV HDG3zrzkHNt+WxoOqEzRsxe+Wh4SLadD5xn5h1CwstPt/EjtzhyOzNJLC3Qbom1f xgnn+mhLnk9iqnyilSL+hjnFmBl9ajLwhcWs69LblqUW5ldr8t+cuho1CJTKH6b6 /seOzSg1P8g= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B321D16216E; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 161D316216D; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:31:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, jrnieder@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com, dstolee@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Create 'expire' and 'repack' verbs for git-multi-pack-index References: <20190424151428.170316-1-dstolee@microsoft.com> <20190514184754.3196-1-dstolee@microsoft.com> <5fadd5ee-0993-ad94-2cda-f8dfe3795336@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:31:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5fadd5ee-0993-ad94-2cda-f8dfe3795336@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:15:44 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 98CF1E62-8BA5-11E9-A59B-72EEE64BB12D-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > On 5/14/2019 2:47 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> Updates in V6: >> >> I rebased onto ds/midx-too-many-packs. Thanks, Junio for taking that >> change first. There were several subtle things that needed to change to >> put this change on top: >> ... > However, this series was dropped from the cooking emails, and never > included this v6. Now that the release is complete, could this be > reconsidered? "reconsider" is a bit strong word, as (at least as far as I recall) it was never "rejected" as an unwanted topic, but was merely postponed to give way to other topics in flight. Thanks for keeping an eye on it and finding the right moment to raising it again. I could go back to the list archive and dig it up, but because it has been a while since it was posted, it may not be a bad idea to send it for a review, after making sure it cleanly applies to 'master', to make it one of the early topics to go 'next' during this cycle, I would think. Thanks.