From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60C41F454 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730591AbfKFChm (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:37:42 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:57656 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730576AbfKFChl (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:37:41 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B5AA1154; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:37:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=FUsExOt7CTalr/ZQUeaT+0bFzXA=; b=HvzUcc H4NTdVLCCW2VKCpO45jR5Rsh7exdFw1Ish7OEp0bWn5t/OyNOA45DFuSukLvCLg3 I3QaanB4EljmWUvRpsr+hAM70hCccS8/Qb5/cTJdaQAZE8e6BBrk0Tny757QFyk3 7pe7mpZSIcCBTd/ojzMIomRoqfrjZyWvOlmXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=gBmtLo6UTojFXLiykkveAbMX+j00kbw4 GJQNgljMTRd0PRzcrDhWjo3zNRDZrEBH6DQT0zNaVvQZAA43tvipP/6K7IKI0ZcQ pn344bqHtxrrAt9LHqN+3LzG+Pf6/BrVfPF8FOvmoZ94iu1f4Lmvs5BVtbRCPby6 Tp4H4lW5nhI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD956A1153; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:37:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 152E8A114E; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:37:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Eric Sunshine , Johannes Sixt , SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] t5520: various test cleanup References: <20191024232139.GA76771@generichostname> <20191104191739.GA61441@generichostname> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:37:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20191104191739.GA61441@generichostname> (Denton Liu's message of "Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:17:39 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 659D939E-003E-11EA-8DA5-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:44:52PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Denton Liu writes: >> >> > There haven't been any comments in a couple days so I think this >> > patchset is ready for inclusion. >> >> It's not like we are in a hurry that we need to fast-forward a topic >> like this one (i.e. general improvement and clean-up, rather than >> fixing regressions introduced in the cycle), so "a couple of days" >> is probably being too impatient. > > Since v2.24.0 has been released, would now be a good time to queue this > patchset? We'd prefer a positive ack or two. Since they are rather ancient messages in Git timescale, perhaps send a new version that is rebased (and retested) on top of 2.24 to ask for reviews? Thanks.