From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900571F5A1 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 02:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727528AbfKMCtW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:22 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:65289 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727365AbfKMCtW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:22 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50454A4499; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DPgluDQTYiRja3QZGuVF6/z5DbQ=; b=O6GERa kLRrAeIWgYNTjcphFDXUC5RlFq3/fNCUrMqi8/qrGD3Sb1fwwxqJwkX7Gwftnc74 qpqqIUUrM+GLaPBgrolMSvebh84/VrSljfjiGELjcbG2r0NdpeDKFWQRTVDIkJgV Qn+Tcud2qwB9m5sa7uGntchG5GzAw/KxYUU4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fyadBqilnl60S5cn+odiTZiedz59SWdt IlEHLEhM7l4ZfgQgPVK8SEhYsGDVXGn9QhzeLgx8qqrhL6XRkWEj/zWM9QipfTaQ wldNHVybFMBHzqoLwm3FA3bBerkIQaWPUT03lT5kqTVPWU4mPacNXii+Te4TqAbh ctbaE4BZxsw= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3623FA4498; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6961FA4495; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fetch_if_missing=0 removal References: Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:49:15 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Tan's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:34:18 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2F595A02-05C0-11EA-88EC-B0405B776F7B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > (Whenever, at $DAY_JOB, we encounter an edge case with partial clone, we > have been submitting patches with test cases for "git fetch" or "git > clone" but sometimes not both, so between 6462d5eb9a and this patch set, > these edge cases would be covered too.) Thanks, wonderful.