From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC321F466 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728809AbgAMSME (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:12:04 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56161 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726878AbgAMSME (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:12:04 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA9540436; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:12:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+eYHX3JWNAWTULGtJX5+qm847+c=; b=uxVWyy cerTInbhjTmfvrwUU7Y7ngRyZVXJ7UJ32DQUpRoFfkKIdi6Y5stDQaFTxLA+ueIm hasuO22ur2W53oN84s4M2EFNnwSfNpqI8OMhR/cQILGlhIEroV0gejNZ7HcVoc9u 2YFYnvps84Aqdj0RCuNaDtyAbFd4jStO+aIP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Jr4tgaQM4yZjAF9o3cE/XQyOidH2heUm qgLCohvZ5lNQCln/Sl0l1mgXaAaYhi6rdQyH65ifTCK5QMmyQcel1fLV5gyGCfsO uxj7UBmtzn6TL85UfRAVApOex6WHLSOF1obxm6m/DreUDUF9Ge/yTkIib/ZzCr7z 9IHZCAw3WFA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4231940435; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:12:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 417F340433; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:12:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Git Mailing List Cc: Phillip Wood , Johannes Schindelin , Rohit Ashiwal , Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: Problems with ra/rebase-i-more-options - should we revert it? References: <089637d7-b4b6-f6ba-cce1-29e22ce47521@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:11:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2020 16:43:38 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 31F80F38-3630-11EA-9E55-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > I will push out what I wish to be able to tag as the final [*1*] > shortly but without actually tagging, so that it can get a bit wider > exposure than just the usual "Gitster tested locally and then did > let Travis try them" testing. I haven't heard from any failure report so (taking no news as good news) I'll cut the final today based on what is already on the public repositories everywhere.