From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45D51F4B9 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 21:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726173AbgAXVL1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:11:27 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:64164 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725747AbgAXVL0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:11:26 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C002C9EB74; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:11:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+dcjy4XEfQyzPp0JqX5kxiIgL4k=; b=yTYZ3R QRC1nsOJgi8lTgzNoEpa90N8M3JvNQg3il4Og2unF9IRiTfKaCsj2X0Y83NO330X jVZnFDHoQE38JxXGXIjhSLVFm5mmDxw9RggfA2HWL00MxLLp3IGuXJkyhULbG+ZK ztZpHLRR4i3SbDivltb27NRm54LTtv+mUJXC0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=x8Ofep26CDT5R+I6HK6z4lObV6oP1IIj E1CufNUvRuSYABcis37F6ksfuMO7iTqQvL+p7RbcnYX2uLGIyKnhRcT8jsRjW2y1 E2bCoxHYI27S9Q418edn0muU6a1gY0iW5E1+g9HTb3Q8vsCgbgmMCimPLN89A1WG 5BpruBXek1g= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FFF9EB72; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:11:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA67B9EB70; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:11:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Emily Shaffer Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Denton Liu , Johannes Schindelin , Eric Wong , Richard Kerry , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] MyFirstContribution: add avenues for getting help References: <20200124200915.249473-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20200124205025.GA140846@google.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:11:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200124205025.GA140846@google.com> (Emily Shaffer's message of "Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:50:25 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 12583BA0-3EEE-11EA-82A7-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Emily Shaffer writes: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:35:28PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> emilyshaffer@google.com writes: >> >> > From: Emily Shaffer >> >> Hmm, unlike folks who use GGG, your From: address seem almost usable >> without having to waste two extra lines (which matters when one has >> to review many patches a day). > > Blame an unhealthy appreciation for being able to write emails in Vim. > > I generate patches with 'git format-patch' - what's the unusable part of > "almost" usable here? Compare your message I am responding here, with your message with the patch in it. This one has a perfectly usable "From:" address, From: Emily Shaffer while the patch e-mail has From: emilyshaffer@google.com which cannot be quite usable as the author identity.