From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7471F487 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729196AbgCaATJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:19:09 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:62308 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729060AbgCaATI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:19:08 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14DB46AD9; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:19:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YwgkmuJqbtWNuXEuqPPU3fulJ/4=; b=kUzriY lR3d3lo5z1LpsYDVU0noxmMwWG9xmDk5eMItO+z8Lg2Juu87WdzuGZQULHRXPqIa quFJY6PoA2QRQc6x0fedzTlyHktJ965C+itDV4wlaruoNdgOdfsbfnrHl78196E+ cQkkBReRaQdXhgXvF3Fk+389NcGVqiFWzJNTk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wt6Tvw8V7ef+Z+o5FYo9ChGwtr2EeBgA llbTk6h0bRfPeZLetV4PF7mKDhnYVuwG//YCogrDkXhWUMKC9Npro9qBgjshzmAS 0wmsQWI/USiDGvChHREdHFwFkktHtjm/tjcud/5zQVfdIMMjut3xRMnmukTJFj2k ftEaqLyEPeU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96E846AD8; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:19:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3275246AD7; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:19:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jiang Xin Cc: Git List , Jiang Xin Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook References: <20200304113312.34229-1-zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> <20200330165754.19195-3-worldhello.net@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:19:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200330165754.19195-3-worldhello.net@gmail.com> (Jiang Xin's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:57:50 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3C4202B8-72E5-11EA-86CC-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jiang Xin writes: > + argv[0] = find_hook("proc-receive"); > + if (!argv[0]) { > + rp_error("cannot to find hook 'proc-receive'"); Perhaps discard "to" from here. Also I notice that other messages given to rp_error() are marked for _(i18n), but this one is not. > + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && > + cat >expect <<-EOF && > + remote: # pre-receive hook > + remote: pre-receive< refs/heads/next > + remote: pre-receive< refs/for/master/topic > + remote: error: cannot to find hook "proc-receive" > + remote: # post-receive hook > + remote: post-receive< refs/heads/next > + To ../upstream > + * [new branch] HEAD -> next > + ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (fail to run proc-receive hook) > + error: failed to push some refs to "../upstream" > + EOF > + test_cmp expect actual && This breaks gettext-poison test. See https://travis-ci.org/github/git/git/jobs/669008025 for example.