From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0A91F5AD for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389419AbgDMWFq (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:05:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63601 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389416AbgDMWFp (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:05:45 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F6E52B66; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:05:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=pgDhK7ub/heUhvoglKgIH6UCKzI=; b=fA1lR9 6tUDeXWzAGkTiMg1wMv1HcJu8Ov7EtFeNFBJDExIpXnNYoW9Anp6rAUO3HFFCfG5 ymqW1Jikei/aM/ty5vAO1uk92dB8jp/FhdF5iWPx0Ja8cAQxDlCuwhCpZUbhn/p/ KnvZq1dHeGM9VDf3biHKqej5Pz9Et8IV7pcos= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=G83Af/lC9QEJtJ9FyoNNe7mGdrZa8CV7 abCTA71D9KhFxKJ0NBzt+MQ9CEOvWBXizALXJrNf5SIibnz9CUMddCmz+bndz+Ur ELwmDEfdF6AS9nFsdbDrQiE3tY741xTs5w3y0APfA/Qci4yUZhU0ehsG5KBGChx4 /1D4BeRGKq4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE5E52B65; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:05:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1773152B64; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:05:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Elijah Newren , Phillip Wood , Git Mailing List , Rohit Ashiwal , Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "Merge branch 'ra/rebase-i-more-options'"" References: <20200407141125.30872-1-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <20200407141125.30872-2-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <43d06bc0-b2ee-0ae6-f22c-9850e4033d45@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:05:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <43d06bc0-b2ee-0ae6-f22c-9850e4033d45@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:58:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EB383E02-7DD2-11EA-8DE2-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: >> I agree that it would make for a much nicer read if the entire patch >> series was simply rebased on top of v2.26.0, with drops instead of >> reverts. I suspect that 4/6 will not even become a fixup, but that the >> resulting patch is really more of an `Initial-patch-by: Rohit` material >> with Phillip as the author on record. >> >> As to the changes, I had a brief look over them, and I have nothing to add >> to Elijah's review except to stress how excited I am about the increased >> test coverage. From my perspective, this makes the patch series 10x >> better. > > Thanks for all your feedback, I'll reroll as a new patch series based on > master Thanks, all.