From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C661F4B4 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2438021AbgJTTPC (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:15:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:62067 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2438018AbgJTTPC (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:15:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504DB85EC4; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:15:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uX1tCSBmzQo4VyeluuEHjBl2Wsk=; b=vZgwhz jRJRIlm5mpVCZbRyc3T4oeqomGJq8bHYOb+K7cmHERtR69lbR7njzB1vdCTK4gUX ruL0CiFmNPQYw2viR4nrYH0WLrS8OLPNOgKEF2d0LTgO4aAzXWQFX7MwQ1Fgk1lr jNjQLXAJmfGpoW6re7Ymt2UZKhQSuIpPXq0BA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=m3ecRpOm7PaP3JS685It3VC3faTAunG3 nPsH40mspk8on6fZBzECDePj/gjAM9CcoPMqJueQvYH/3zolAUL1fhQyIl0IcpDL XpoiWnFzRzyNXCiDb911ArEFGdSk/E0KApR+RjAm6swPGqJNBS/UsvUjUemSvCsl esUYKeJnZCM= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4373A85EC2; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:15:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCF5885EC1; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:14:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Matheus Tavares Bernardino Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git , Jeff Hostetler , Christian Couder , Jeff King , Thomas Gummerer , Elijah Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/19] parallel-checkout: add tests for basic operations References: <64b41d537e68a45f2bb0a0c3078f2cd314b5a57d.1600814153.git.matheus.bernardino@usp.br> <20201020013558.GA15198@google.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:14:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Matheus Tavares Bernardino's message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:18:21 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8C35930C-1308-11EB-9D4C-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Matheus Tavares Bernardino writes: > Oh, I didn't know about the portability issue with \+. This is already > in `next`, but I guess it's worth sending a follow-up patch to fix it, > right? (I see we have a second \+ occurrence in t7508, which could be > changed in the same patch.) Note that soon, typically a week, after a release, the tip of the next branch is rewound and all the topics that did not graduate to master has a chance to get a clean start. This may be a good use case for that chance.