From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5731F4B4 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 22:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729043AbgLXWlP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:41:15 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50611 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728851AbgLXWlP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:41:15 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C29A243E; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:40:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+p+sAxrg2CN797nLPQmm6F0AwB8=; b=owMKnC q5xnREzRn81tyuACDwhAmQ6chA6+68lm9A/W/RBPxdcLAJawV656e0IEKtXV4o9V NU3bJBzMP/YpWSn7izTslgQqM3sOW4tWHpFG8jV5tUe/knpA7islaLv+LS//CBiR AxeizvMvUxFZnx1H+ictvIUMhZnCxyEmiPUI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KBwWqErCyKbw3Zcvc3jSKxv0zpRJkx0G YNbBDWRKR0C7o9DBejT38gFCxE8Vx/Pf9oyEmpknry8yeJpFAgh/WsEKIMqbuyzt ry8hOnAdzRdU0uriDkZUYhiZ2tbvxDgTCuI/Q1GkmJ0REEE5QLl0Fkfn14gdJ+jJ L9fDicZp8qo= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E14BA243C; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:40:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD67BA243B; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:40:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Felipe Contreras Cc: "Randall S. Becker" , =?utf-8?B?J8OGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason' , 'Pratyush Yadav' , 'David Aguilar' , 'Seth House' , 'Git Mailing List' , 'Christian Couder' , git@sfconservancy.org Subject: Re: Nobody is THE one making contribution References: <5fdc18a91c402_f2faf20837@natae.notmuch> <20201218054947.GA123376@ellen> <5fdc7a7d3a933_f4673208d0@natae.notmuch> <20201219001358.GA153461@ellen> <20201221042501.GA146725@ellen> <5fe033e0ec278_96932089d@natae.notmuch> <20201221073633.GA157132@ellen> <5fe134eeaec71_11498208f9@natae.notmuch> <20201222150124.mnfcyofm4qyvvj4n@yadavpratyush.com> <5fe2c64bd3790_17f6720897@natae.notmuch> <5fe2d89c212e8_18dc12083e@natae.notmuch> <5fe36790793ae_2354120839@natae.notmuch> <87r1ngufmf.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <5fe424d0528a2_7855a208d3@natae.notmuch> <00f401d6da06$be415560$3ac40020$@nexbridge.com> <5fe4b5cbacf0d_19c92087f@natae.notmuch> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:40:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5fe4b5cbacf0d_19c92087f@natae.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Thu, 24 Dec 2020 09:37:47 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 06FD3E74-4639-11EB-926B-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Felipe Contreras writes: > Randall S. Becker wrote: >> On December 24, 2020 12:19 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> > We can narrow down the part I'm talking about: >> > >> > d. I *agree* that a record of the contribution is maintained >> > indefinitely. >> > >> > I don't agree with that. >> >> Clause d is important to maintain compatibility with GRPD[1] rules >> about maintaining identifying information. This clause is more than >> about the contribution. It is about consent to maintain your name and >> email on record indefinitely, as part of the contribution, in the git >> repository, without the ability to rescind the permission at some >> point in the future. > > I didn't mean I don't agree that clause (d) should be there. > > I mean if in a particular contribution I don't agree that a record of > the contribution is maintained indefinitely with my name, then clause > (d) is not met. And it is not actually my true contribution, but a > bastardization of it made by somebody else. > > You shouldn't assign to my name changes I don't agree with in > perpetuity. The way I read our DCO, especially its part (b), is that it is very much designed to allow editing, tweaking and improving on others' patches with editor's sign-off while passing a patch around.