From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EB31F452 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=hXC2CzkR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234925AbjDYSDF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:03:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55484 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234759AbjDYSDD (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:03:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3239217A3E for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-517bb01bac9so4386856a12.0 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682445747; x=1685037747; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:subject:cc:to :from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WJ0B4+pMLnWRVOI7fyEsY4nmgAOLraA65QiTtdXQyEY=; b=hXC2CzkRRdVdcYNlJsiGlUoDvA7NkS+M9XQ7VZfbO3Eqhr/ACfNjOXoqh76ZTybwdT x/SJgJB8sdtsL372ljKPnoBAuEVvlgmrGyZhb/0Kp4rIDhdfkF+UHbRowx8qvXDTDyET fjifpoRJfPhnmrok7pYeo5b9ptEvT/j+k1gj1iCOzZGWcOut5/KWNlmH/nPRwyDe7IFv HiVCypg6z6XNpJnr0JWOr+s7lsNt+5/qaPRiwBZGhKMTwlD3UuoUXYV/Ul3itahPKJAo /U2x3yZzNQrBkimKgyIIzZ1I4ZiGt9JQ4NdfMmTXUZg2F+JvoxoozyMHhLK6pLhPkFDY H0Xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682445747; x=1685037747; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:subject:cc:to :from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=WJ0B4+pMLnWRVOI7fyEsY4nmgAOLraA65QiTtdXQyEY=; b=RZKZcCncElGAf2B5n87f9vjMw2Ym8oqLqdZ5rJbfoDYipmHw5m7ECG2Y8+eKf1sDh2 IvPRVoi+7wt5G/lIsT4kAh9fON3aBCsJgNjM3oJvFiqtXo42GFfMb3Ts5ADHEVnO9dQk OZmsDf3dXLi1qQuY+6993Pj16xn92FzTmIr5yh6gpdDpi2/7qc60hVFtjugd11Hv2YYb id2jvjjqH/dehO3VT6gtxGVGfAe4+FwT5gPVms7/KGqLYpl6ISyi6MnlYfm5ALiEuN4H lQ5zUPq9/8sgfsL6Z2TedDO9BFQLWOT7SDtoYAuoL6SKqslRdPo6gk2elXXnQ/LA4f1l DLUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cky/n4FPTkZAYveqkoUtwJcNIBphLiUJKTgrf+7mDFPtKE5/y/ /M10DiHXQ7GzRa3iRgw3ABw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YlbUGYypaq6xoLhz2nQpqvCPxjWvYJsl4chsHHI9AGxN8+O1Y7YRZJc051CCZ/OHKbnKPwEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:40ca:b0:1a6:ee5a:7208 with SMTP id t10-20020a17090340ca00b001a6ee5a7208mr18661590pld.18.1682445746748; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (187.137.203.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.203.137.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1-20020a170902a40100b001a95c7742bbsm5513288plq.9.2023.04.25.11.02.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pack-bitmap: boundary-based bitmap traversal References: Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:02:25 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > This improves many cases where using bitmaps was significantly *slower* > than regular, non-bitmap traversal. In some instances, using bitmaps is > still slower than the non-bitmap case, but it is a substantial > improvement over the classic bitmap walk. > ... > In a large repository on GitHub.com, the timings to compute the objects > unique to "master", as in: > > $ git rev-list --count --objects master --not --exclude=master --branches > > improve as follows: Curious---when would it be significantly faster to use bitmaps? "Most of the time"? "In not-too-large repository?"