From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:18:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy1bcfmev.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f01f4eb011b400faeff1c33934775a521dec7a3d.1708612605.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:36:42 +0000")
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:
> This change is not accompanied by a regression test because the code in
> question is only reached at the `checkout` stage, i.e. after the merge
> has happened (and therefore the tree objects could only be missing if
> the disk had gone bad in that short time window, or something similarly
> tricky to recreate in the test suite).
Makes sense.
A complete tangent I wonder is if unit-test-minded folks have clever
ideas to allow better test coverage, perhaps injecting a failure on
demand to any codepath (in this case, the codepath to write the
resulting tree) to simulate a situation where we fail to parse the
tree.
In any case, the patch looks good, of course, and I see no need for
further comments.
Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> merge-ort.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c
> index c37fc035f13..79d9e18f63d 100644
> --- a/merge-ort.c
> +++ b/merge-ort.c
> @@ -4379,9 +4379,11 @@ static int checkout(struct merge_options *opt,
> unpack_opts.verbose_update = (opt->verbosity > 2);
> unpack_opts.fn = twoway_merge;
> unpack_opts.preserve_ignored = 0; /* FIXME: !opts->overwrite_ignore */
> - parse_tree(prev);
> + if (parse_tree(prev) < 0)
> + return -1;
> init_tree_desc(&trees[0], prev->buffer, prev->size);
> - parse_tree(next);
> + if (parse_tree(next) < 0)
> + return -1;
> init_tree_desc(&trees[1], next->buffer, next->size);
>
> ret = unpack_trees(2, trees, &unpack_opts);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 9:49 [PATCH 0/4] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 7:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06 9:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06 9:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-07 7:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 21:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Junio C Hamano
2024-02-07 7:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:02 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-22 14:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-07 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-08 0:52 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-22 14:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-22 14:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-22 17:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-02-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 18:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-23 8:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-23 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] fill_tree_descriptor(): mark error message for translation Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 18:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy1bcfmev.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).