From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78BEB1F44D for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 21:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=sasl header.b=s/JU6Dhy; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21721F21793 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 21:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E61013CFA5; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="s/JU6Dhy" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA29137778 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 21:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713562281; cv=none; b=gV7KAqfw0yZ5IvMqTQRyn+9XyzqxbEPaR2sx/1z8xtV/A5PL/pCk+Mt9fcuAv+UyMQ/H4YezLXu5mg19vV8AUbME28gvNoVIK0ew76jgd4U337Yn2X1Jvd19KPnrqUuaiswdk+FquZJ5PfSbfchLERM4dHuLR6mtonyR1gXwN7Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713562281; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7eRJ1PnNtUknx/ULLE00UG0d8eW+ShDshx0jEWWgNlw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AC/brU9vweAYvZW6O71+2SwWWtWNXszklfe+Z1OUcd/ma4B+yCWvCg18/JjLn+Y2dvwrKYo2jTXS49/ccdDoEXDvT1EtprYkAieMBdYdnUp6bCQM4xaXY+i9MWHZqNx2DgZjrqkKpSQt+WUwr6RZvfdXOP+yvemJ8lv1+G77Yrw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=s/JU6Dhy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC87334580; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:31:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7eRJ1PnNtUknx/ULLE00UG0d8eW+ShDshx0jEW WgNlw=; b=s/JU6Dhy8Zveh1NoFKOUZDVUgUiDBNGAILn32pS1eBbbXZfVcQOz3v vtpGqOMskf9ZGic9hjt97VjQTyynm0T9RUaYfyQ2e+4ye2kA9R18erxCzg2SKfrz iVat/orQiJJEOIXG07qsq41tkYBAbKF1bMMtNlKtzyndR+zUm2gJI= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54A13457F; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:31:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.120.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 562303457D; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:31:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Wong Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] switch to tombstone-free khashl table In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:40:06 -0700") References: <20240325230704.262272-1-e@80x24.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:31:13 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 26BE4B74-FE94-11EE-8BA3-F515D2CDFF5E-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Junio C Hamano writes: > Eric Wong writes: > >> The memory improvement is minor, but any memory reduction at all >> is welcome at this point. Fortunately, this set of changes is >> unintrusive. >> >> I have some other ideas that I'll hopefully get to implement before >> swapping kills all my SSDs (see bottom). > > Please describe what this topic aims at to sell the topic better. > Are we trying to reduce memory footprint? In other words, if this > topic were to hit a released version of Git, what would the short > paragraph description for the topic in the release notes look like? > ... So, did anything happened since this exchange? I remember that we caught and fixed a few minor sparse errors, but other than that, I am not sure what to do with this topic. Not that I want to merge loud tree-wide topics down during the prerelease period... Thanks.