From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] travis-ci: enable sequential test execution for t9113 and 9126 Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 10:11:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1463649009-56941-1-git-send-email-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <1463649009-56941-3-git-send-email-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <20160519100658.GA20225@dcvr.yhbt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: larsxschneider@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Wong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 19 19:12:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b3RTs-0000Cf-RQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2016 19:11:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932504AbcESRLY (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2016 13:11:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56807 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932420AbcESRLX (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2016 13:11:23 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD391DC7B; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:11:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cuRdFVs567y5SmhLVbHuDGRlQ9A=; b=svmWuZ hhHU4MhJJGGuMX/AjhzmIDrpDF7G14hpmbQBFlo+2FptDCASLtBxvlx2o2zlNY0r o/Vg8BIXOigWVFqYN/Skoi5zUViOY8d3hoAkwoFJgiHOy/GjsY0tUS+ldjQd9YJw mCln3t53rQ2HdYzg4SxYkGjMsk0kQ6nceAbIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qRV73w0Aej+5Y+hGzrrnszURFdtvTez4 2cpasMKmP3aNCSYjipa/vAN92VsWZmqz8SIMuChgcU6CmkYbZkjQj7PfuOZRWA3E LyPiLrkxiZl5QJeieDxMkF8vRKz4rmrnwaSyrv6pdaPUAcp729XAjkh5QaWBdlIM 23W/ew81cZE= Received: from pb-smtp1. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C2C1DC79; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:11:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D1CD1DC76; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:11:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160519100658.GA20225@dcvr.yhbt.net> (Eric Wong's message of "Thu, 19 May 2016 10:06:58 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B571C1AA-1DE4-11E6-ADD4-9A9645017442-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Eric Wong writes: > Anyways, how about making the tests run on separate ports and > not worry about serializing them at all? Yeah, that does sound like a more sensible approach.