From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715581FCA9 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933422AbcINWa7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:30:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63436 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933367AbcINWa6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:30:58 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176453E318; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:30:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZVKewXpf10TnKeB1AhNqTJTICGc=; b=AxaTqc KtvDOEAZXt3n4ImVxv6yYbkNv/ushx4tkN+1cdExLFd+XvX/lpYplVQRo7cu4b+U txL3Wm9pj74AU5Ew89aU3f1qyNZ78WwZ4aV+qkSnKrkcPwvtzXU0DrkR4UNuTiuT e8/ZJywKk3t76FlzwwB4BIyvrwsz38OK8GcLQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=yEzjR07NkQ6OV1lhMzV6QQ3HTs2DWfF3 kHTzIG7ahiRydsUrJxSToXwSqfmhe6uY9UjKgN1OVliny+PmZjE7+hAlS3eE3b/g yaL5j+PuR+OUAmwHRKxldSSADXuRJCJ9VkKZbW49D1ode4k0CYMRja/ppEXXAXx7 9Nr3WXv8IXE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F68D3E317; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:30:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B85D3E316; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:30:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Heiko Voigt Cc: Jeff King , Stefan Beller , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jens Lehmann , Fredrik Gustafsson , Leandro Lucarella Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serialize collection of changed submodules References: <20160824173017.24782-1-sbeller@google.com> <20160824183112.ceekegpzavnbybxp@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160824230115.jhmcr4r7wobj5ejb@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160914173124.GA7613@sandbox> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:30:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160914173124.GA7613@sandbox> (Heiko Voigt's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:31:24 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E750757A-7ACA-11E6-A23E-51057B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Heiko Voigt writes: > Sorry about the late reply. I was not able to process emails until now. > Here are two patches that should help to improve the situation and batch > up some processing. This one is for repositories with submodules, so > that they do not iterate over the same submodule twice with the same > hash. > > The second one will be the one people without submodules are interested > in. Thanks. Will take a look at later as I'm already deep in today's integration cycle. Very much appreciated.