From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11689201C2 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751336AbdKNBSF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:18:05 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59616 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751161AbdKNBSE (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:18:04 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37A0AB55F; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:18:03 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ai4x4vkq5fsfOoDh/fb2y8c31GE=; b=LLFmI+ IWRQMqCPo+ezvnq6dR2+ptyx0A7zCPksPbiHt8NLK/geXXtS92XMFPkRYze5l8dp gGEKFG1Rt7QN1pgEwC2zxsCSzq2+IhN1c8JDP+YxK/6aepwEmOoxbUBaMOrb15LN Pac74Lk8IfiljiL74c8cBDz/sdQrHwu63cjXI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=hWeFABMCy+fhwpNymzzdp7vQ1wIHS7Bd qKBsL4BYvKH1pdY2jIhsNOjB0wp68LkL+qUCPPRcIxD1WlrTvGRnsB8dwYp0CgKT N9QlteH3aWM2f5cBkAPyY1ugAUkEYE16cMMOstFI+b/yqstJNNoVLQzVhF0blL/G yvx3MeNYO54= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8C3AB55E; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:18:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6316AB55B; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:18:02 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] progress: Fix progress meters when dealing with lots of work References: <20171110173956.25105-1-newren@gmail.com> <20171110173956.25105-4-newren@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:18:01 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:05:05 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A914823E-C8D9-11E7-A630-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: > 2) Instead of counting pairs of source/dest files compared, just > count number of dest paths completed. (Thus, we wouldn't need a value > big enough to hold rename_dst_nr * rename_src_nr, just big enough to > hold rename_dst_nr). This sounds like the most sensible thing to do even if we do switch to larger integer size, but that is orthogonal to the main point of this series.