From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C807F1F404 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 22:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932665AbeCIWSY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:18:24 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:45978 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932104AbeCIWSX (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:18:23 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id h2so3084516wre.12 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:18:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=oLlUVij6S520oQSkR8LwDo3GFditZEEAsL2UYIpsWZE=; b=fGv85MUSecoYEqWRSB+xfKEDOzMtGzqlLsinxIRg310nVtZKveMAH0Enn4W48/BeCd ywWp18tu+LRQkTXx6DPGzgcESATASXhUjwuFl90C5qvPYZijbZzT4sCyb1J2ObUuUF2X 7hP/7jfvxaSq20tzDz2IHYSy8D52pUb3P9MvNxK0hBXCMF5DDrG1Jam++3mQ694+Jo6e JlTABmZdKdwuX8YJT2jwZKGQl4wjc03t4WiSA1SrkuReLqWZrK8DeH1Dx2FbdglRZTQs 1c3ToGnqB3qhZ/CAGFOztjtojL8WSIqCTQ2s5S3if9YUf1UDq8pgxwH8drrnLMxfpN83 aDzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=oLlUVij6S520oQSkR8LwDo3GFditZEEAsL2UYIpsWZE=; b=X2fPHz8+6WuYAEDAowg5Uj5r0U606FYgb3L7a8cXeTizKipGgTXpVSBUBs2hS/WqPp 2ZvXCyJmKMs10uMzsiWNZCCQBQG6mpX5wtgD/c7OrCs4xql3kSuFY5O9ylCkGiF8BkJ+ r2b08bNCbS7hOFYEC6tU7XsIbyouc4cY2n7NqLDoC10+uXOCWn4jC6eYhfwWeaaD4IIv Yk1XSXlcJu6wPSyugI4DmLUKFW3dDP3rsF6G8bgH0i5N3G13w8SW8d17Z9Ws0txC5UIa h+w/HRneuhhEOwoTQeBcuAwCB0r1SBv+D5LUQ0GiDGHcZZUc04KDxTZnu26M78HuGL+O raxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GhuZYMilH3s39/hBjh1TmjYZiZQ6hdVox68rWRODgjKG21d1ew ktNsIPh+gCDhgpvxMPZnuXOtAI7f X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvFO8bJly7LHumWsfg/tqGt8JLDYV+n607QJaEx3fVH3npAVJr+0oB/Wg8dcgYj+Zi/6m8zow== X-Received: by 10.223.139.88 with SMTP id v24mr33009wra.44.1520633901691; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u127sm2608429wmd.30.2018.03.09.14.18.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:18:19 -0800 (PST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Marc Strapetz Cc: Thomas Gummerer , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git stash push -u always warns "pathspec '...' did not match any files" References: <349f9369-b799-4f7b-bda1-33bcbd7ea067@syntevo.com> <20180303154654.GH2130@hank> <08d765ec-b2d7-7087-fca5-2eecefcef9cf@syntevo.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:18:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <08d765ec-b2d7-7087-fca5-2eecefcef9cf@syntevo.com> (Marc Strapetz's message of "Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:44:30 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Marc Strapetz writes: > Thanks, I can confirm that the misleading warning message is fixed. > > What I've noticed now is that when using -u option, Git won't warn if > the pathspec is actually not matching a file. Also, an empty stash may > be created. Soooo..., does it mean that the patch Thomas posted and you confirmed trades one issue with another issue with a similar graveness? Is this something we want to "fix" without adding another breakage?