From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] merge-recursive: enforce rule that index matches head before merging
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 13:05:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwoucozje.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180701012503.14382-9-newren@gmail.com> (Elijah Newren's message of "Sat, 30 Jun 2018 18:25:02 -0700")
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> ...[merge will] abort if there are any changes registered in the index
> relative to the `HEAD` commit. (One exception is when the changed index
> entries are in the state that would result from the merge already.)
>
> While this high-level description does describe conditions under which it
> would be safe to allow the index to diverge from HEAD, it does not match
> what is actually implemented. In particular, unpack-trees.c has no
> knowledge of renames, and these two exceptions were written assuming that
> no renames take place.
I think the above analysis is quite correct (I even suspect that the
rule was outlined long before any renaming merge was designed).
> diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
> index 855ca39ca..8f7a8e828 100644
> --- a/merge-recursive.c
> +++ b/merge-recursive.c
> @@ -3257,6 +3257,13 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
> struct tree **result)
> {
> int code, clean;
> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + if (!o->call_depth && index_has_changes(&the_index, head, &sb)) {
> + err(o, _("Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge:\n %s"),
> + sb.buf);
> + return -1;
> + }
This change to ensure the index is pristine upfront makes sense,
too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-03 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-03 6:58 [RFC PATCH 0/7] merge requirement: index matches head Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] t6044: verify that merges expected to abort actually abort Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] t6044: add a testcase for index matching head, when head doesn't match HEAD Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] merge-recursive: make sure when we say we abort that we actually abort Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] merge-recursive: fix assumption that head tree being merged is HEAD Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 13:52 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-06-03 23:37 ` brian m. carlson
2018-06-04 2:26 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-06-04 3:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-06-05 7:14 ` Elijah Newren
2018-06-11 16:15 ` Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] t6044: add more testcases with staged changes before a merge is invoked Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] merge-recursive: enforce rule that index matches head before merging Elijah Newren
2018-06-03 6:58 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] merge: fix misleading pre-merge check documentation Elijah Newren
2018-06-07 5:27 ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Fix merge issues with index not matching HEAD Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] read-cache.c: move index_has_changes() from merge.c Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] index_has_changes(): avoid assuming operating on the_index Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 19:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-01 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] t6044: verify that merges expected to abort actually abort Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] t6044: add a testcase for index matching head, when head doesn't match HEAD Elijah Newren
2018-07-10 20:39 ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-07-11 3:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] " Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] merge-recursive: make sure when we say we abort that we actually abort Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] merge-recursive: fix assumption that head tree being merged is HEAD Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-01 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] t6044: add more testcases with staged changes before a merge is invoked Elijah Newren
2018-07-01 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] merge-recursive: enforce rule that index matches head before merging Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-07-01 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] merge: fix misleading pre-merge check documentation Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqwoucozje.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).