From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB971F453 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395122AbfBMWhw (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:37:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com ([209.85.221.47]:33153 "EHLO mail-wr1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727471AbfBMWhv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:37:51 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id i12so4413744wrw.0 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:37:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/UuO8fiOS4bQxOBXKgz7+LZucg/7sarn+dB6JnWEtVI=; b=CEZ9NRwTMPVnSSfbLdOejcXshYU+AnFaFRYM1xxyoj66wEoh+lreiROGbZWOxVw7NZ SbRcvt9zcHUcmsWAUcyxSUwCnFP2InPZV2pW0go3d+9VbAh6jOdgknWqFpEhlMHYiB6c 96StUO+CHbrM7WSZ8Le18mVLJ8z4AFS9Rp2m/+ve5oKIU5AWNFDYBbqRQj/JXWMbUvbd k7yZX2+hRfFBRH0ogNo+/7dmKwArKc6rTsJ0p3KI6wJJpq3rF3CZNcUmGxizTWPjvaY6 NQ/PsCTNS8uvAVBuyIw0uGVsX0FD9mNzv98hdCkPUh/xgfSdBLm65NotzutxcQ2FWq6u ORBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/UuO8fiOS4bQxOBXKgz7+LZucg/7sarn+dB6JnWEtVI=; b=HSj1UzoyT0dNKDJCepZTNJwCMfkvJYqDMCCMyjfgbxRyDx/hc7Uk081UfPFd85Zr+Z nonA6WQMHf9bMcVla+csGie5JvasVS2HL4ErmMI1+0eebzZvA3QoZnF1Z8sHNQte/h4U eYsprXeGZSyF7jF/aS/Or8aljlcAO5w0+SZWBjj70g3ybXftmV0BrBO2kbD/OYUuvqj+ JWWBSRDWnTgb1a3bZNJdIpsaihdpVs2O2z1VzXDhqEw2JNELhTLsODqZKDgRPBvAKIwQ JrzZmSGdflakI/PRvCnlBYrgJol46fCw/MmkZkmYbK0UFKXL7r4sKt0PvUK3nNWoZefB ynZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAub++JAkSsHrgAPe2XFf4l6/BiWqpx6m0CxNKYw9cS0V2E7gCRJu cgI/UNM8wh8ccT15onG+vPI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYD3jkXirzWf8zyZ33pv0vTkQFzrMwUGk6q50QclnkxNp0dxDB+Bvk83gxe7byuzJmGAOiU7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d0c9:: with SMTP id z9mr290365wrh.132.1550097469871; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:37:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z3sm374998wmi.32.2019.02.13.14.37.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:37:49 -0800 (PST) From: Junio C Hamano To: William Hubbs Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, chutzpah@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] config: allow giving separate author and committer idents References: <20190204184850.10040-1-williamh@gentoo.org> <20190205195212.25550-3-avarab@gmail.com> <87k1iekkea.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20190206000413.GA734@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <20190213164322.GA3625@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:37:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20190213164322.GA3625@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> (William Hubbs's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:43:22 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org William Hubbs writes: > I am writing back onn this thread because I'm not quite sure of the > status. v5 of the patch seemed ok, but there were some changes discussed > that would have created a v6. The v6 changes though were never really > clear. I'm not sure whether I am supposed to be doing something more or > whether I'm waiting for you. ;-) > > Can you write back and let me know? In general, unless I ask you to wait, a contributor would almost never be waiting for me. I think Ævar's v6 was not up to par, but I thought that v5 from you (which is in 'next') was good enough to cook in 'next'. The topic will not be moving out of 'next' until the final 2.21 is released anyway, so if anything, I'd say the ball is in his court to update his version after the release, when your v5 may have a chance to be kicked out of 'next' and replaced _if_ there is a better version by then.