From: Junio C Hamano <email@example.com>
To: Taylor Blau <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2019, #03; Tue, 16)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:14:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190417054250.GA98165@Taylors-MBP.hsd1.wa.comcast.net> (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:42:50 -0700")
Taylor Blau <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> That's this one
>> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:13:06 -0700 (1 week, 3 hours, 23 minutes ago)
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] harden unexpected object types checks
>> which I think is what has been queued and what is listed in the
>> message you are responding to.
> Ah, perhaps you could clarify some confusion I have about the "What's
> Cooking" emails (or at least point me somewhere I could un-confuse
> This topic is in the "Cooking" section with a "-" (which I recall means
> that it's in 'pu'), but there is no "Will merge to ..." line below it
> from you.
> That makes sense to me, but I'm not sure whether or not that means it's
> queued. Do you say that a topic is queued once it's on your pu, or once
> you have written "Will merge to..."?
> Thanks in advance for your clarification.
Hmph, I guess I shouldn't use the verb "queue" if it implies a lot
more than there is to it. I create a topic branch out of a patch
series on the list at some point in the iteration of a series and
merge it to 'pu'; I can say "I queued the topic to 'pu'" after doing
so. The verb to me does not mean anything more than that.
The fact that a topic is queued on 'pu' does not mean much. It can
be taken as a sign "Gitster thought that it may become 'next' worthy
material, either as-is or with further polishing and replacing."
Once a topic gets discussed on list and it seems apparent that there
is a concensus that supports it, I may mark the topic as "Will merge
to 'next'" in the What's cooking report, but I may not realize that
the list already reached such a concensus and may leave it unmarked
in the report.
So "this has been battle tested in such and such environment" and/or
"this round was reviwed by the thread here and they were supportive"
etc. is a very appreciated response to the "what's cooking" report
to help me merge the topic down to 'next'.
"I have sent a reroll at ..." I typically hear when I miss a
rerolled version and what is listed is still from an old iteration,
hence my "Eh, you are pointing at what I have queued" reaction.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 13:19 Junio C Hamano
2019-04-16 14:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-04-16 15:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 7:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-04-18 0:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 9:33 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-04-17 9:52 ` Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 10:22 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-04-16 15:27 ` Ben Peart
2019-04-17 2:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-16 16:25 ` Stalled ds/ branches (was What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2019, #03; Tue, 16)) Derrick Stolee
2019-04-16 17:32 ` jt/clone-server-option " Jonathan Tan
2019-04-17 2:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 16:18 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-04-18 1:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 2:37 ` What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2019, #03; Tue, 16) Taylor Blau
2019-04-17 5:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 5:42 ` Taylor Blau
2019-04-17 6:14 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-04-18 6:54 ` Taylor Blau
2019-04-17 12:50 ` jc/format-patch-error-check, was " Johannes Schindelin
2019-04-18 0:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 12:52 ` ab/test-lib-pass-trace2-env, " Johannes Schindelin
2019-04-18 0:19 ` Denton Liu
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).