From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEA81F4B4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726329AbgLVT6u (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:58:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:60176 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725783AbgLVT6u (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:58:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DE31109B7; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:58:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mvwlwWOzL3aj4B4+xLdAzeX6358=; b=d6hQbb OwglYOaRXLJ7TflxPbtxYiwTrkNbVi+o92wEIdiwy3zPMJ6Dhw6oNg6zpMEZWeZJ uL3KmaZvjCYyHCg5FFP0hliFv4RfLK4W6Q/txkLZUhwScykoO0OKe23hk08FX25H MwdbjxHb1jWj89vfcWJGhzaFdneFEYuIL6fDA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=h7p0LsMmPXk6eQLdcVQHpTr87pb2szfP cwgeuTb2eakXtqq+AeWYfOH/dBGaZcHTYLttHiiL1GSL5+sxZZ+OC2rxHu6rRA+9 aKaeYoImAFj0RUgD93oywkC4zMOUnAG9cFJgx+HPT+8Uxo/UKxCxEPGB7goZMj2f 1Do+ZA9ZtqU= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1001D1109B6; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:58:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FE1D1109B5; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:58:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Vasyl Vavrychuk Cc: Eric Sunshine , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-send-email.txt: Mention less secure app access might need to enable. References: <20200829153920.17155-1-vvavrychuk@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:58:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 06 Sep 2020 14:52:21 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 01614B86-4490-11EB-92E4-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Junio C Hamano writes: >> >>> Vasyl Vavrychuk writes: >> >> Another thing I forgot to say. >> >> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/git-send-email.txt: Mention less secure app access might need to enable. >> >> Especially with grammofix s/to enable/to be enabled/ applied, the >> above is way too long as a title and would stand out like a sore >> thumb in "git shortlog --no-merges v2.28.0..v2.29.0" output. >> Something like >> >> Subject: [PATCH] send-email doc: mention less secure app access with GMail >> >> perhaps. >> >> Thanks. > > Anything new on this topic? No rush, but I'd hate to see a > basically good topic to be left in the stalled state too long. Just pinging old threads that we have been expecting a reroll, but it has been more than 3 months. Has an update been sent that I missed? Thanks.