From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7891F8C6 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233488AbhIHFW3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:22:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:51498 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232756AbhIHFW3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:22:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A37A147CBC; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:21:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Vya0qL5FB02ZrFk1IK2Q3prl6Xxr1rCRCU3AMx 5H3K8=; b=QdjPOo7rERW7yznBZdm6ecUR/Tv6x7aOa3b5OP2/MpfPj99h5Irfv9 RGITTrcAgIP/SJPXzMhXKlRlt+ZCGQGh8xXrI0yrxMUYAyIJJMT/dSqbUhblZnf+ Qvt05MXrsxAzoe0Kc0QkK4vOAomMukRa46P9V2JWC6z7GeZyasdSs= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DB0147CBB; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:21:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8410147CB9; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:21:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Derrick Stolee Cc: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" , git@vger.kernel.org, newren@gmail.com, matheus.bernardino@usp.br, stolee@gmail.com, Johannes Schindelin , Eric Sunshine , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Sparse index: delete ignored files outside sparse cone References: Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:21:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 08 Sep 2021 01:42:24 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 98DCE54C-1064-11EC-94B7-98D80D944F46-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: > Updates in V5 > ============= > > * Updated the locality of a cache_entry pointer. > > * Rephrased a comment. > > * Removed the patch adding a config option. > > * I tried, but failed, to create a scenario where the call to > cache_tree_update() causes a test to fail. I still think this is valuable > as defensive programming for the reasons mentioned in the patch, which is > why I didn't remove them here. OK. The 'sg/test-split-index-fix' topic that has been queued in 'seen' textually depended on the earlier iteration of this topic, so I'll discard it while replacing this topic.