From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41D61F403 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 23:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Mda54YBg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229519AbiJNXcj (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:32:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36444 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229470AbiJNXch (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:32:37 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A496110EA32 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E2D1C54A9; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:32:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3NJ+IZ1FfnKZ7HZKN9WS9H+nxwAh5fbeyklItP fwLrE=; b=Mda54YBgCmnXi0zQ89mb/bmM5DkaFZroedxDYpYjdG4iGhAs9G/fTD LNlbGOwTc2t+V7ZtvFuDs9DDsBY23r6C0pYJZvkj/7Y/YkIFVq4bFPf152JYe6Jd 1XlFWFF+SqPwkXFBsS4Vc1IytFJjAZzkLZX/2n0TcuxoSPz05jHc0= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C4F1C54A7; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:32:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE03B1C54A6; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:32:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Eric DeCosta Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] fsmonitor: Implement fsmonitor for Linux References: Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:32:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:45:32 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7A07B7B4-4C18-11ED-B6C4-C2DA088D43B2-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" writes: > Goal is to deliver fsmonitor for Linux that is on par with fsmonitor for > Windows and Mac OS. > > This patch set builds upon previous work for done for Windows and Mac OS > (first 6 patches) to implement a fsmonitor back-end for Linux based on the > Linux inotify API. Again, the first six patches are a part of what is queued as ed/fsmonitor-on-networked-macos that is now in 'next' but lacks a fix-up commit from Jeff King. I understand that it might not be easy/possible (e.g. perhaps it is a limitation of GGG?), but I really prefer not to see them re-posted as part of this series, as I have to apply them and make sure there are no changes from the last one before discarding them. Anyway, thanks for an update. Will requeue.