From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>,
Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] combine-diff: do not pass revs->dense_combined_merges redundantly
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:29:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqvboynhq2.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33951a1d4be8ec15eec569e1a36c0a620b9edaa6.1409860234.git.tr@thomasrast.ch> (Thomas Rast's message of "Sat, 6 Sep 2014 19:57:02 +0200")
Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch> writes:
> The existing code passed revs->dense_combined_merges along revs itself
> into the combine-diff functions, which is rather redundant. Remove
> the 'dense' argument until much further down the callchain to simplify
> callers.
It was not apparent that the changes to diff_tree_combined_merge()
was correct without looking at both of its callsites, but one passes
the .dense_combined_merges member, and the other in submodules
always gives true, which you covered here:
> Note that while the caller in submodule.c needs to do extra work now,
> the next commit will simplify this to a single setting again.
> diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
> index c3a61e7..0499de6 100644
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
> @@ -482,10 +482,13 @@ static void find_unpushed_submodule_commits(struct commit *commit,
> struct rev_info rev;
>
> init_revisions(&rev, NULL);
> + rev.ignore_merges = 0;
> + rev.combined_merges = 1;
> + rev.dense_combined_merges = 1;
> rev.diffopt.output_format |= DIFF_FORMAT_CALLBACK;
> rev.diffopt.format_callback = collect_submodules_from_diff;
> rev.diffopt.format_callback_data = needs_pushing;
> - diff_tree_combined_merge(commit, 1, &rev);
> + diff_tree_combined_merge(commit, &rev);
> }
I briefly wondered if there can be any unwanted side effects in this
particular codepath that is caused by setting rev.combined_merges
which was not set in the original code, but seeing that this &rev is
not used for anything other than diff_tree_combined_merge(), it
should be OK.
Also I wondered if this is leaking whatever in the &rev structure,
but in this call I think rev is used only for its embedded diffopt
in a way that does not leak anything, so it seems to be OK, but I'd
appreciate if submodule folks can double check.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-06 17:56 [PATCH v3 0/8] --remerge-diff Thomas Rast
2014-09-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] merge-recursive: remove dead conditional in update_stages() Thomas Rast
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] merge-recursive: internal flag to avoid touching the worktree Thomas Rast
2014-09-08 17:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] merge-recursive: -Xindex-only to leave worktree unchanged Thomas Rast
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] combine-diff: do not pass revs->dense_combined_merges redundantly Thomas Rast
2014-09-08 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-09-11 19:37 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] Fold all merge diff variants into an enum Thomas Rast
2014-09-08 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] merge-recursive: allow storing conflict hunks in index Thomas Rast
2014-09-09 17:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] name-hash: allow dir hashing even when !ignore_case Thomas Rast
2014-09-09 17:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] log --remerge-diff: show what the conflict resolution changed Thomas Rast
2014-09-08 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-09 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-09 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqvboynhq2.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iveqy@iveqy.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=tr@thomasrast.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).