From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008B220756 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752264AbdARAHm (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:07:42 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61684 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751595AbdARAHk (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:07:40 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A413619A7; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:07:39 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=nE5fhM6CiofYzJuR6FJfy38XKjk=; b=iMbRVp /oMCVMxS5I0DqP6D8Ttqd7Dy5TF4yWy1BBfdqibiwKlNbuDNK7EooAtc2KC8eVMO FlnX4Xoz3tmcNu2flyZX/ivAC3121FZ3U/SuiAeYrUiSVZPRaq7W6hxr4xgODPLS OT37L7C9YeH/19BVTZzb873HMvxy0bw7v0cRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZFAUlAwT2VyHOQjNPvxJ+eh0p1lvg2Wx zMpRHG6B5GuGYFTb8hJtGJj/6lJljjoVe5aHUvH/RD1djp87NAD4OHLLaxHcBZVF tAgCgHsXW3vnFVITtMb7XknNJYZDy0OT0g2KhP+WRGgHBZtbboR02IlRikSIOuIL zSisowQeDm0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E77619A6; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:07:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD3DF619A5; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:07:38 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: santiago@nyu.edu Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, sunshine@sunshineco.com, walters@verbum.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add --format to tag verification References: <20170117233723.23897-1-santiago@nyu.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:07:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170117233723.23897-1-santiago@nyu.edu> (santiago@nyu.edu's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:37:17 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1F83F378-DD12-11E6-9973-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org santiago@nyu.edu writes: > From: Santiago Torres > > This is the sixth iteration of [1][2][3][4][5], and as a result of the > discussion in [5]. The main goal of this patch series is to bring > --format to git tag verification so that upper-layer tools can inspect > the content of a tag and make decisions based on it. > > In this re-woll we: > > * Changed the call interface so printing is done outside of verification. > > * Fixed a couple of whitespace issues and whatnot. With the small code structure change Peff suggested the result looks much easier to read. I didn't spot any more problems. Will replace what has been sitting in my tree. Thanks.