From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1331F667 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751893AbdHPT2n (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:28:43 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52406 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbdHPT2m (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:28:42 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8C2A5600; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:28:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uTejNm8H2plIgWpEtddhA++l+Xs=; b=HqvQi2 pC9cS9F3wlIL+APhFk38SptpcW+qKfz0WLywL72emKjtSdNxmcWwLWg/yTMcsRvD 2cO7ktxqI85l3F4WyFszQTNuS30NZ+8GrOC0k3FwE8Ha9LuY5Db+K5PgApP9i+Pe dHwWcVNy72kcSmZEYjTCHi36LBva9DXmI+uzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=yO8r5GWtP4xT/L0P2QFX0zgsczhnG7JX PIikKvZT0tIKm8pmlE3APsgVabXJjU5WSqTRSvy/Gq07S7E6ec1kB2Av2CJoLz42 c/8FZK0qNxltLepkApkOGTPIXHl0D8n/vzzCiNR9kGHtsuB2WrlZQK1ESCIOVDZa 7bQpuLmWh84= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418BA55FF; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:28:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A50EAA55FB; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:28:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Kaartic Sivaraam Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2017, #03; Mon, 14) References: <943ad6c6-a5fb-cbb0-9eca-ac1c3e51fa15@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:28:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <943ad6c6-a5fb-cbb0-9eca-ac1c3e51fa15@gmail.com> (Kaartic Sivaraam's message of "Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:55:29 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18552F98-82B9-11E7-A05A-9D2B0D78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Kaartic Sivaraam writes: > It's been around 4 or 5 issues of 'What's cooking in git.git' and I haven't > heard about the patches found at, > > http://public-inbox.org/git/<20170730111705.12444-1-kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> > > and > > https://public-inbox.org/git/<20170730115908.13841-1-kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> > > What has happened to them? Nothing has. Neither thread seems to have any comment from anybody but you, and I took it as an indication that people do not think it is a good change. I do not find the s/branch/parameter/ too bad (although I would have said "arguments" instead). For the other one, I personally think split sentences and lines make output look worse, but this is obviously subjective (just like the patch itself).