From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA8120954 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754534AbdLGPbg (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:31:36 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59714 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754005AbdLGPbf (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:31:35 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6041EC0395; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:31:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=8345Lhid4BqL2eZf5qDns2x6Wpk=; b=BvotID 1G+s7AQay/eOtziXpz4UFhiSiU1eDEgG+nFBgNompdtCS2br2RAynr53tEVgbz/+ UZI2Wiwx03beLmidhX5YUdAkg7AXpI7DoA6ePW5R/lOL+lqqHusLWdK6bSpplk40 WbApQGstC6keqtlOeqxgtbVZahkV6AygXp/K0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=oVkroZvwzYQF8x88lGHUpQ9bsFcKH7hE gauEQi4kld1lqJbJ4HNrQP7Hd+d7dVCx3HSj+ZWGmusqYNm9p1m3Ed+Px6+cPUZA y7kFnICFuUFrC/Bw3Ylc87yFJRGlZR8zBWZc2VjmEJiMkVZpPQC/dUaMuZhT7vP0 1cmSX+eqKrI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E19DC0394; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4D88C0393; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:31:34 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Matthieu Moy Cc: BENSOUSSAN--BOHM DANIEL p1507430 , ALBERTIN TIMOTHEE p1514771 , "Michael Haggerty" , PAYRE NATHAN p1508475 , "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify triangular workflow References: <1512034932-14499-1-git-send-email-timothee.albertin@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> <24f652b96fd940ee91e2741830382a72@BPMBX2013-01.univ-lyon1.fr> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 07:31:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Matthieu Moy's message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:43:48 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B5460D9C-DB63-11E7-9ECC-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Matthieu Moy writes: > Not a native speaker, but according to wikipedia > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they) it's OK to write > "maintainer [singular, but already neulral] may get merge conflicts when > they [sinugular they] ..." Yes.